Nuclear Regulation

A Perspective on Liability Protection for a Nuclear Plant Accident Gao ID: RCED-87-124 June 2, 1987

In response to a congressional request, GAO provided information on issues pertaining to the Price-Anderson Act, which establishes funding to compensate for personal injury and property damage from a nuclear accident and limits the nuclear industry's liability for such accidents. GAO assessed the: (1) potential consequences of various nuclear power plant accidents; (2) likelihood of accident occurrence; and (3) impact of inflation on the protection the act originally provided.

GAO noted that the act will expire on August 1, 1987 unless Congress extends it. GAO found that: (1) the potential for a major commercial nuclear accident still exists; (2) private insurance would not fully cover the expected consequences of a major accident; (3) since indemnity agreements under the act cover the life of Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licenses and Department of Energy (DOE) contracts, expiration of the act's indemnity authority could have an immediate impact on the people living near and the contractors operating DOE nuclear facilities; and (4) DOE officials feel that, without the act's indemnity, contractors may be reluctant to operate DOE nuclear-defense facilities, and states may not agree to the transportation and storage of high-level nuclear waste. GAO also found that: (1) due to inflation, the act's liability protection is too low to provide reasonable compensation for the worst nuclear plant accident; (2) because of a lower liability limit for DOE nuclear activities, the level of protection for the public is lower than that of commercial plants; and (3) although the act covers all off-site accident damages resulting from the release of radioactive material, it is not clear if the act covers the costs for a precautionary evacuation when a release appears imminent but does not actually occur.


Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:

The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.