Nuclear Regulation

NRC's Restart Actions Appear Reasonable--But Criteria Needed Gao ID: RCED-89-95 May 4, 1989

In response to a congressional request, GAO assessed the criteria that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) uses to allow nuclear powerplants to restart operations after a shutdown to correct safety or management problems, focusing on: (1) the Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania, plant's operating history; (2) NRC rationale for allowing the plant to continue operations despite its history of problems; (3) the extent to which NRC would consider outstanding maintenance items before allowing the plant to restart; and (4) the manner in which NRC addressed public comments.

GAO found that: (1) although NRC did not have criteria for setting out the actions that either it or the utility should take after a shutdown, NRC actions included approval of the utility's corrective action plan, several inspections, independent reviews, public meetings, and restart approval; (2) the Peach Bottom plant was in a lower range of licensee performance evaluations than 15 other plants reviewed, had more marginally satisfactory ratings than 9 other plants, and had more inspection violations than 5 other plants; (3) between 1970 and 1987, NRC issued eight notices of violation against the Peach Bottom plant and the utility paid civil penalties totalling $485,000; (4) at the time of shutdown, NRC ordered the utility to reduce its backlog of maintenance repairs, and the utility subsequently found that it had a larger backlog, but it had reduced the backlog signficantly by March 1989; (5) NRC and the utility held nine meetings to allow public comment on restart activities; (6) as a result of the shutdown, NRC permitted inspections of commercial powerplants without advance notice to the utility and published a policy statement concerning the conduct of nuclear powerplant operations, including employees' behavior; and (7) an independent review agreed that NRC could restart the plant subject to completion of certain equipment modifications and procedural changes.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Team: Phone:


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.