Response to Questions Related to Comparable Worth and Sex-Based Wage Discrimination

Gao ID: GGD-85-40 March 1, 1985

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO answered a series of questions concerning the effectiveness of the comparable worth concept in identifying and remedying sex-based wage discrimination. Specifically, GAO was asked: (1) whether there is any current law affecting federal pay or classification which differentiates on the basis of sex; (2) how the comparable worth concept was treated during debate on the 1963 Equal Pay Act; (3) whether the gender of private sector employees is considered when determining the pay rates of federal employees; (4) what personal statistics influence individual earnings; and (5) whether two job evaluation experts can reach different conclusions about an identical job ranking.

GAO found that: (1) there is no current statute which uses gender to differentiate between employees; (2) Congress rejected language requiring equal pay for comparable work in favor of the equal work standard currently contained in the act; (3) consideration is not given to the gender of private sector employees in federal pay surveys; (4) individual characteristics are not considered in job evaluations, but rather, job characteristics are evaluated; and (5) since evaluation systems are subjective, it is possible for two evaluation experts to arrive at different conclusions.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.