Federal Workforce

OPM's Approach for Conducting Personnel Management Evaluations Gao ID: GGD-88-11 November 4, 1987

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) method for evaluating federal agencies' personnel management practices, focusing on: (1) why and how OPM changed its personnel management approach; (2) whether the revised approach is consistent with OPM responsibilities under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978; (3) the implementation status of the revised approach; and (4) agency personnel managers' perceptions of the revised and former approaches.

GAO found that the former approach: (1) relied on detailed annual case-study reviews of about 200 agencies to assess compliance with laws, rules, and regulations; (2) did not permit thorough evaluations because of insufficient staff and funds; and (3) did not necessarily provide information on the general effectiveness of personnel programs governmentwide. GAO found that the revised approach: (1) focused on the collection and review of governmentwide data to identify systemic federal personnel problems; (2) involved the compilation of computerized databases; (3) included 1- or 2-day visits, over a 5-year period, to all 4,100 agency installations with 50 or more employees; (4) discontinued two of seven components and reduced assessment visits to 3,500 installations due to insufficient staff and funds; and (5) lacked specific, uniform criteria for the assessment visits. GAO also found that, of the nine agencies it contacted, personnel managers at: (1) two agencies were satisfied with the revised approach, citing better communication with OPM, less disruption of operations, and increased numbers of installations reviewed; and (2) seven agencies expressed concern about the revised approach, citing insufficient time for adequate assessment, limited feedback, and unsubstantiated findings.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.