Reservation and Award of Section 8(a) Small Business Act Contracts to Arcata Associates

Gao ID: AFMD-81-33 March 23, 1981

GAO reviewed the reservation and award of Section 8(a) Small Business Act contracts to a firm to determine whether allegations made by a competing firm are valid and to what extent the management by the Small Business Administration (SBA) of the 8(a) program was deficient in this situation. GAO reviewed contract and 8(a) program files and conducted interviews to identify the process and procedures followed in qualifying the firm for the 8(a) and Pilot Programs and in reserving and awarding contracts involving the firm. GAO also reviewed applicable SBA rules and regulations and coordinated its efforts with the SBA Inspector General.

GAO believed that some of the allegations concerning the SBA reservation and award of contracts to the firm had merit. GAO found that the management by SBA of the firm's participation in the 8(a) program was deficient. Using its Pilot Program authority, SBA formally reserved an agency's requirement for the firm and in doing so halted the agency's attempt to procure its requirements through open competition. The contract was awarded to SBA, and the related subcontract was awarded by SBA to the firm. The protesting firm had won two prior contracts to perform the work. The protester argued that the award would be contrary to the statutory and regulatory competency requirements, the intent of the Pilot Program, and SBA eligibility standards and business plan requirements. GAO found that SBA awarded the contract to a firm that: (1) would provide a service unrelated to its capabilities as identified in its business plan or the experience of its principal or professionals; (2) was not evaluated for technical capability to perform as required by SBA procedures; (3) has not maintained its status as a small business because of the 8(a) awards it has received; (4) has received 8(a) support that is almost four times the approved amount under SBA procedures; (5) was allowed to select contract requirements and then change its business plan to reflect the capabilities required by the selected contract; and (6) has not maintained a reasonable balance between 8(a) and non-8(a) sales.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Walter L. Anderson Team: General Accounting Office: Accounting and Financial Management Division Phone: (202) 275-5044


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.