Human Capital
Workforce Diversity Governmentwide and at the Small Business Administration
Gao ID: GAO-08-725T April 23, 2008
Hispanics are the fastest-growing segment of the civilian labor force, which is defined as those 16 and older (including federal workers) who are employed or looking for work and are not in the military or institutionalized. In August 2006, GAO reported on factors affecting Hispanic representation in the federal workforce and efforts being taken by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), and other agencies, including the Small Business Administration (SBA)--an independent agency that aids, counsels, assists, and protects the interests of small business concerns (GAO-06-832). In May 2007, GAO issued a report that contained data on Hispanic representation in the federal government through fiscal year 2006 (GAO-07-493R). In April 2008, GAO testified on diversity in the Senior Executive Service (SES) and the senior ranks of the U.S. Postal Service (GAO-08-609T). In response to a request to provide updated information on minorities and Hispanics in the federal workforce, GAO is providing demographic data--with an emphasis on Hispanic representation--related to the federal government as a whole and SBA's workforce. GAO obtained these data from OPM's Central Personnel Data File (CPDF).
Data in OPM's CPDF show that Hispanic representation governmentwide for permanent and nonpermanent employees increased from 6.6 percent in 2000 to 7.7 percent in 2007. At SBA, Hispanic representation for 2007 among permanent and nonpermanent employees was 8.6 percent, which exceeded Hispanic representation governmentwide, but represented a decline from 9.7 percent in 2000. For the SES, the highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce, GAO recently looked more closely at the workforce diversity of those who were career, or permanent, appointments (GAO-08-609T). Data in OPM's CPDF show that as of September 2007, the overall percentages of women and minorities, including Hispanics, have increased in the career SES governmentwide and the SES developmental pool for potential successors since October 2000. As part of GAO's recent analysis of the diversity of the SES and the SES developmental pool, GAO looked more closely at career, or permanent, SES appointments at federal agencies, including SBA. Unlike the increase in the number of career SES governmentwide and those in the SES developmental pool for potential successors for October 2000 through September 2007, the number of career SES and those in the SES developmental pool at SBA declined. For this testimony, GAO did not analyze the factors that contributed to changes in SBA's workforce from October 2000 through September 2007. However, OPM and EEOC in their oversight roles require federal agencies, including SBA, to analyze their workforces. As part of a strategic human capital planning approach, agencies need to develop long-term strategies for acquiring, developing, motivating, and retaining staff. An agency's human capital planning should address the demographic trends that the agency faces with its workforce, especially retirements.
GAO-08-725T, Human Capital: Workforce Diversity Governmentwide and at the Small Business Administration
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-08-725T
entitled 'Human Capital: Workforce Diversity Governmentwide and at the
Small Business Administration' which was released on April 23, 2008.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
Testimony:
Before the Subcommittee on Regulations, Health Care, and Trade,
Committee on Small Business, House of Representatives:
United States Government Accountability Office:
GAO:
For Release on Delivery:
Expected at 12:00 noon EDT:
Wednesday, April 23, 2008:
Human Capital:
Workforce Diversity Governmentwide and at the Small Business
Administration:
Statement of George H. Stalcup:
Director:
Strategic Issues:
GAO-08-725T:
GAO Highlights:
Highlights of GAO-08-725T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on
Regulations, Health Care, and Trade, Committee on Small Business, House
of Representatives.
Why GAO Did This Study:
Hispanics are the fastest-growing segment of the civilian labor force,
which is defined as those 16 and older (including federal workers) who
are employed or looking for work and are not in the military or
institutionalized. In August 2006, GAO reported on factors affecting
Hispanic representation in the federal workforce and efforts being
taken by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Office
of Personnel Management (OPM), and other agencies, including the Small
Business Administration (SBA)”an independent agency that aids,
counsels, assists, and protects the interests of small business
concerns (GAO-06-832). In May 2007, GAO issued a report that contained
data on Hispanic representation in the federal government through
fiscal year 2006 (GAO-07-493R). In April 2008, GAO testified on
diversity in the Senior Executive Service (SES) and the senior ranks of
the U.S. Postal Service (GAO-08-609T).
In response to a request to provide updated information on minorities
and Hispanics in the federal workforce, GAO is providing demographic
data”with an emphasis on Hispanic representation”related to the federal
government as a whole and SBA‘s workforce. GAO obtained these data from
OPM‘s Central Personnel Data File (CPDF).
What GAO Found:
Data in OPM‘s CPDF show that Hispanic representation governmentwide for
permanent and nonpermanent employees increased from 6.6 percent in 2000
to 7.7 percent in 2007. At SBA, Hispanic representation for 2007 among
permanent and nonpermanent employees was 8.6 percent, which exceeded
Hispanic representation governmentwide, but represented a decline from
9.7 percent in 2000.
For the SES, the highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the
federal workforce, GAO recently looked more closely at the workforce
diversity of those who were career, or permanent, appointments (GAO-08-
609T). Data in OPM‘s CPDF show that as of September 2007, the overall
percentages of women and minorities, including Hispanics, have
increased in the career SES governmentwide and the SES developmental
pool for potential successors since October 2000.
Governmentwide: SES;
October 2000, Number: 6,110;
October 2000, Percent Women: 23.6;
October 2000, Percent Minorities: 13.8;
September 2007, Number: 6,555;
September 2007, Percent Women: 29.1;
September 2007, Percent Minorities: 15.8.
Governmentwide: SES potential developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s);
October 2000, Number: 135,012;
October 2000, Percent Women: 28.2;
October 2000, Percent Minorities: 17.0;
September 2007, Number: 149,149;
September 2007, Percent Women: 34.3;
September 2007, Percent Minorities: 22.5.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM‘s CPDF.
As part of GAO‘s recent analysis of the diversity of the SES and the
SES developmental pool, GAO looked more closely at career, or
permanent, SES appointments at federal agencies, including SBA.
SBA: SES;
October 2000, Number: 39;
October 2000, Percent Women: 33.3;
October 2000, Percent Minorities: 33.3;
September 2007, Number: 36;
September 2007, Percent Women: 27.8;
September 2007, Percent Minorities: 38.9.
SBA: SES potential developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s);
October 2000, Number: 548;
October 2000, Percent Women: 34.1;
October 2000, Percent Minorities: 24.6;
September 2007, Number: 541;
September 2007, Percent Women: 40.7;
September 2007, Percent Minorities: 31.8.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM‘s CPDF.
Unlike the increase in the number of career SES governmentwide and
those in the SES developmental pool for potential successors for
October 2000 through September 2007, the number of career SES and those
in the SES developmental pool at SBA declined. For this testimony, GAO
did not analyze the factors that contributed to changes in SBA‘s
workforce from October 2000 through September 2007. However, OPM and
EEOC in their oversight roles require federal agencies, including SBA,
to analyze their workforces. As part of a strategic human capital
planning approach, agencies need to develop long-term strategies for
acquiring, developing, motivating, and retaining staff. An agency‘s
human capital planning should address the demographic trends that the
agency faces with its workforce, especially retirements.
To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-08-725T]. For more
information, contact George Stalcup at (202) 512-6806 or
stalcupg@gao.gov.
[End of section]
Chairman Gonzalez, Ranking Member Westmoreland, and Members of the
Subcommittee:
I am pleased to be here today to provide the Subcommittee with
information on diversity, including Hispanic representation, of the
federal workforce and at the Small Business Administration (SBA).
Earlier this month, we reported on the diversity of the senior ranks of
the federal government and the U.S. Postal Service.[Footnote 1] In
August 2006, we reported on factors affecting Hispanic representation
in the federal workforce and efforts being taken by the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM), and other agencies, including SBA--an agency that
aids, counsels, assists, and protects the interests of small business
concerns.[Footnote 2] In May 2007, we issued a report that contained
data on Hispanic representation in the federal government through
September 2006.[Footnote 3] While we have not done any additional
analysis on Hispanic representation since our August 2006 report, for
this testimony, we have added data on Hispanic representation for
September 2007.
As we have previously reported, Hispanics are the fastest-growing
segment of the civilian labor force (CLF),[Footnote 4] with their
representation increasing from 8.5 percent in 1990 to 13.3 percent in
2007.[Footnote 5] Our August 2006 report identified citizenship and
education as the two measurable factors having the greatest impact on
Hispanic representation in the federal workforce. OPM reported that
Hispanic representation in the federal workforce increased from 5.3
percent in 1990 to 7.8 percent for 2007.[Footnote 6]
Driven by long-term fiscal constraints, changing demographics, evolving
governance models, and other factors, the federal government is facing
new and more complex challenges in the 21st century, and federal
agencies must transform their organizations to meet these challenges.
Strategic human capital management must be the centerpiece of any
serious change management strategy. We currently have work under way
reviewing SBA's organizational transformation efforts. Today, as
requested, my remarks will focus on demographic data related to the
federal government as a whole and SBA's workforce, with an emphasis on
Hispanic representation.
For our analyses of governmentwide and SBA demographic data, we
extracted data from OPM's Central Personnel Data File (CPDF). We
believe the CPDF is sufficiently reliable for the informational purpose
of this testimony.[Footnote 7] We conducted this performance audit in
April 2008 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable
basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.
We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for
our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.
Representation of Hispanics Increased Governmentwide and at Most
Agencies from 2000 through 2007:
Hispanic representation in the governmentwide workforce increased from
6.6 percent in September 2000 to 7.7 percent in September 2007.
[Footnote 8] Table 1 shows a breakdown of the representation of
Hispanics by Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act agencies for those
years.[Footnote 9]
Table 1: Hispanic Representation by CFO Act Agency for 2000 and 2007:
CFO Act agency: Agriculture;
Percent in September 2000: 5.8;
Percent in September 2007: 6.7.
CFO Act agency: AID;
Percent in September 2000: 3.5;
Percent in September 2007: 4.1.
CFO Act agency: Commerce;
Percent in September 2000: 4.0;
Percent in September 2007: 3.9.
CFO Act agency: Defense;
Percent in September 2000: 6.0;
Percent in September 2007: 6.3.
CFO Act agency: Education;
Percent in September 2000: 4.6;
Percent in September 2007: 4.4.
CFO Act agency: Energy;
Percent in September 2000: 5.4;
Percent in September 2007: 6.4.
CFO Act agency: EPA;
Percent in September 2000: 4.7;
Percent in September 2007: 5.0.
CFO Act agency: FEMA;
Percent in September 2000: 10.5;
Percent in September 2007: [A].
CFO Act agency: GSA;
Percent in September 2000: 4.9;
Percent in September 2007: 5.4.
CFO Act agency: HHS;
Percent in September 2000: 3.1;
Percent in September 2007: 3.5.
CFO Act agency: DHS;
Percent in September 2000: [B];
Percent in September 2007: 18.3.
CFO Act agency: HUD;
Percent in September 2000: 7.0;
Percent in September 2007: 7.2.
CFO Act agency: Interior;
Percent in September 2000: 4.7;
Percent in September 2007: 5.1.
CFO Act agency: Justice;
Percent in September 2000: 12.9;
Percent in September 2007: 9.0.
CFO Act agency: Labor;
Percent in September 2000: 6.9;
Percent in September 2007: 6.8.
CFO Act agency: NASA;
Percent in September 2000: 5.0;
Percent in September 2007: 5.6.
CFO Act agency: NRC;
Percent in September 2000: 2.5;
Percent in September 2007: 5.0.
CFO Act agency: NSF;
Percent in September 2000: 2.7;
Percent in September 2007: 2.5.
CFO Act agency: OPM;
Percent in September 2000: 3.9;
Percent in September 2007: 3.9.
CFO Act agency: SBA;
Percent in September 2000: 9.7;
Percent in September 2007: 8.6.
CFO Act agency: SSA;
Percent in September 2000: 10.1;
Percent in September 2007: 13.1.
CFO Act agency: State;
Percent in September 2000: 4.1;
Percent in September 2007: 4.7.
CFO Act agency: Transportation;
Percent in September 2000: 4.9;
Percent in September 2007: 6.2.
CFO Act agency: Treasury;
Percent in September 2000: 8.8;
Percent in September 2007: 8.9.
CFO Act agency: VA;
Percent in September 2000: 6.3;
Percent in September 2007: 6.9.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM's CPDF.
Notes: Data on Hispanic representation by agency include permanent and
nonpermanent employees. AID is the Agency for International
Development; EPA is the Environmental Protection Agency; FEMA is the
Federal Emergency Management Agency; GSA is the General Services
Administration; HHS is the Department of Health and Human Services; DHS
is the Department of Homeland Security; HUD is the Department of
Housing and Urban Development; NASA is the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration; NRC is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; NSF is
the National Science Foundation; SSA is the Social Security
Administration; and VA is the Department of Veterans Affairs.
[A] FEMA was an independent agency and 1 of the 24 CFO Act agencies
until the formation of DHS in 2003.
[B] DHS did not exist before March 2003. It was created from 22
agencies or parts of agencies, including the U.S. Customs Service,
which was formerly located in the Department of the Treasury; FEMA; the
Coast Guard; and part of the Immigration and Naturalization Service,
which was formerly located in the Department of Justice.
[End of table]
Hispanic representation increased at 16 CFO Act agencies from September
2000 through September 2007. As of September 2007, Hispanic
representation in 5 CFO Act agencies exceeded the 7.7 governmentwide
percentage: the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of
Justice, SBA, the Social Security Administration, and the Department of
the Treasury. Of those 5, representation at 2--the Department of
Justice and SBA--declined from 2000 through 2007.[Footnote 10]
Table 2 shows the representation of Hispanics under another subset of
the federal workforce, by pay plan/grade, for 2000 and 2007.
Table 2: Hispanic Representation Governmentwide by Pay Plan/Grade for
2000 and 2007:
Pay plan/grade: Blue collar;
Percent in September 2000: 7.6;
Percent in September 2007: 7.8.
Pay plan/grade: Grades 1-4;
Percent in September 2000: 8.7;
Percent in September 2007: 9.2.
Pay plan/grade: Grades 5-8;
Percent in September 2000: 8.0;
Percent in September 2007: 9.5.
Pay plan/grade: Grades 9-12;
Percent in September 2000: 6.6;
Percent in September 2007: 8.4.
Pay plan/grade: Grade 13;
Percent in September 2000: 4.3;
Percent in September 2007: 5.5.
Pay plan/grade: Grade14;
Percent in September 2000: 3.7;
Percent in September 2007: 4.6.
Pay plan/grade: Grade 15;
Percent in September 2000: 3.3;
Percent in September 2007: 4.1.
Pay plan/grade: SES[A];
Percent in September 2000: 3.1;
Percent in September 2007: 3.7.
Pay plan/grade: SL/ST[B];
Percent in September 2000: 1.9;
Percent in September 2007: 2.3.
Pay plan/grade: ES[C];
Percent in September 2000: 6.4;
Percent in September 2007: 5.6.
Pay plan/grade: Other[D];
Percent in September 2000: 5.6;
Percent in September 2007: 7.0.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM's CPDF.
Note: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees.
[A] The SES consists of both permanent and nonpermanent appointments,
paid according to the SES pay schedule and those in the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) who have equivalent positions. These are
the highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce.
[B] SL/ST includes those in the Senior Level and Senior Technical pay
plans and those in FAA who have equivalent positions. These are
primarily engineers, scientists, and other top-level professionals.
They do not have the leadership role of the SES.
[C] ES consists of Executives, who are politically appointed agency
leaders paid according to the Executive Schedule.
[D] Other includes those who could not be placed in one of the above
pay plans or grades.
[End of table]
Hispanic representation increased in all plans/grades governmentwide
but one, ES, which consists of Executives, who are politically
appointed agency leaders paid according to the Executive Schedule. For
this testimony, we did not analyze factors that contributed to the
changes in Hispanic representation from 2000 to 2007 or changes by pay
plans or grade levels.
Data presented up to this point have been for both permanent and
nonpermanent employees. For the Senior Executive Service (SES), the
highest nonpolitically appointed leaders in the federal workforce, we
recently looked more closely at those who were career, or permanent,
appointments.[Footnote 11] As we have reported, leadership in agencies
across the federal government, especially at senior executive levels,
is essential to providing accountable, committed, consistent, and
sustained attention to human capital and related organizational
transformation issues. Having a diverse SES corps, which generally
represents the most experienced segment of the federal workforce, can
be an organizational strength that can bring a wider variety of
perspectives and approaches to bear on policy development and
implementation, strategic planning, problem solving, and decision
making. Table 3 shows the changes in the representation of career SES
governmentwide from October 2000 through September 2007.
Table 3: Changes in the Career SES Governmentwide:
Equal employment opportunity group: African American;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Number: 512;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Percent: 8.4;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Number: 560;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Percent: 8.5;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Number: +48;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Percent: +0.1.
Equal employment opportunity group: American Indian/Alaska Native;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Number: 75;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Percent: 1.2;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Number: 88;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Percent: 1.3;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Number: +13;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Percent: +0.1.
Equal employment opportunity group: Asian/Pacific Islander;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Number: 103;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Percent: 1.7;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Number: 153;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Percent: 2.3;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Number: +50;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Percent: +0.8.
Equal employment opportunity group: Hispanic;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Number: 155;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Percent: 2.5;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Number: 236;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Percent: 3.6;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Number: +81;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Percent: +1.1.
Equal employment opportunity group: White;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Number: 5,261;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Percent: 86.1;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Number: 5,502;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Percent: 83.9;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Number: +241;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Percent: -2.2.
Equal employment opportunity group: Unspecified/other;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Number: 4;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Percent: 0.1;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Number: 16;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Percent: 0.2;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Number: +12;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Percent: +0.1.
Equal employment opportunity group: Total[A];
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Number: 6,110;
Career SES governmentwide: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Number: 6,555;
Career SES governmentwide: September 2007: Percent: 100.0;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Number: +445;
Changes in career SES governmentwide: Percent: +0.0.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM's CPDF.
Notes: Governmentwide includes civilian employees of all cabinet-level
departments, independent agencies, commissions, councils, and boards in
the executive branch except the intelligence agencies, the U.S. Postal
Service, and the Foreign Service (as of 2007).
[A] Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
[End of table]
As shown in table 3, the two greatest percentage changes among equal
employment opportunity (EEO) groups within the career SES
governmentwide from October 2000 to September 2007 were a decrease
among Whites and an increase among Hispanics.
The vast majority of potential successors for career SES positions will
come from the general schedule (GS) pay plan for grades GS-15 and GS-
14, the levels that serve as the SES developmental pool.[Footnote 12]
Table 4 shows the changes in the representation of the SES
developmental pool governmentwide from October 2000 to September 2007.
Table 4: Changes in the SES Developmental Pool Governmentwide:
Equal employment opportunity group: African American;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Number: 10,679;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Percent: 7.9;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Number: 15,547;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Percent: 10.4;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Number: +4,868;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Percent: +2.5.
Equal employment opportunity group: American Indian/Alaska Native;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Number: 1,254;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Percent: 0.9;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Number: 1,528;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Percent: 1.0;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Number: +274;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Percent: +0.1.
Equal employment opportunity group: Asian/Pacific Islander;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Number: 6,361;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Percent: 4.7;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Number: 9,808;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Percent: 6.6;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Number: +3,447;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Percent: +1.9.
Equal employment opportunity group: Hispanic;
ES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Number: 4,668;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Percent: 3.5;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Number: 6,611;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Percent: 4.4;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Number: +1,943;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Percent: +0.9.
Equal employment opportunity group: White;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Number: 111,936;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Percent: 82.9;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Number: 115,368;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Percent: 77.4;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Number: +3,432;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Percent: -5.5.
Equal employment opportunity group: Unspecified/other;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Number: 114;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Percent: 0.1;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Number: 287;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Percent: 0.2;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Number: +173;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Percent: +0.1.
Equal employment opportunity group: Total[A];
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Number: 135,012;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October
2000: Percent: 100.0;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Number: 149,149;
SES governmentwide developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September
2007: Percent: 100.0;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Number: 14,137;
Changes in SES governmentwide developmental pool: Percent: +0.0.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM's CPDF.
Notes: Governmentwide includes civilian employees of all cabinet-level
departments, independent agencies, commissions, councils, and boards in
the executive branch except the intelligence agencies, the U.S. Postal
Service, and the Foreign Service (as of 2007). We included GS-15, GS-
14, and equivalent employees. GS-equivalent employees are those in
equivalent grades under other pay plans that follow the GS grade
structure and job evaluation methodology or are equivalent by statute.
[A] Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
[End of table]
As shown in table 4, the two greatest percentage changes among EEO
groups within the SES governmentwide developmental pool from October
2000 to September 2007 were a decrease among Whites and an increase
among African Americans.
Hispanic Representation Increased at SBA from 2000 through 2007, and
Retirement Eligibility Presents Opportunities for Affecting Workforce
Diversity:
SBA was established as an independent agency of the federal government
by the Small Business Act of 1953, among other things, to assist small
business concerns.[Footnote 13] In pursuing its mission of aiding small
businesses, SBA provides small businesses with access to credit,
primarily by guaranteeing loans through its 7(a) and other loan
programs, and provides entrepreneurial assistance through partnerships
with private entities that offer small business counseling and
technical assistance. SBA also administers small business development
and procurement programs, which are designed to assist small businesses
and small disadvantaged businesses in their development and in
obtaining federal contracts and subcontracts. In addition, SBA makes
loans to businesses and individuals trying to recover from disasters.
In fiscal year 2007, SBA carried out its programs with about 5,000
employees in headquarters and field offices.[Footnote 14] Based on your
request, for this testimony as shown in table 5, we are providing data
on Hispanic representation at SBA by pay plan/grade for 2000 and 2007.
Table 5: Hispanic Representation at SBA by Pay Plan/Grade for Fiscal
Years 2000 and 2007:
Pay plan/grade: Blue collar;
Percent in September 2000: [A];
Percent in September 2007: [A].
Pay plan/grade: Grades 1-4;
Percent in September 2000: 10.5;
Percent in September 2007: [B].
Pay plan/grade: Grades 5-8;
Percent in September 2000: 12.6;
Percent in September 2007: 10.7.
Pay plan/grade: Grades 9-12;
Percent in September 2000: 10.3;
Percent in September 2007: 8.1.
Pay plan/grade: Grade 13;
Percent in September 2000: 6.6;
Percent in September 2007: 9.1.
Pay plan/grade: Grade 14;
Percent in September 2000: 6.2;
Percent in September 2007: 5.6.
Pay plan/grade: Grade 15;
Percent in September 2000: 9.4;
Percent in September 2007: 8.8.
Pay plan/grade: SES;
Percent in September 2000: 8.0;
Percent in September 2007: 12.2.
Pay plan/grade: SL/ST;
Percent in September 2000: [C];
Percent in September 2007: [C].
Pay plan/grade: ES[D];
Percent in September 2000: [A];
Percent in September 2007: [A].
Pay plan/grade: Other[E];
Percent in September 2000: 6.1;
Percent in September 2007: 2.3.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM's CPDF.
Notes: These data include permanent and nonpermanent employees. The SES
consists of four categories of appointments: career, which is a
permanent appointment, and noncareer, limited term, and limited
emergency, which are nonpermanent. SL/ST includes those in the Senior
Level and Senior Technical pay plans and those in FAA who have
equivalent positions. These are primarily engineers, scientists, and
other top-level professionals. They do not have the leadership role of
the SES.
[A] Because the total number of individuals employed in this category
was less than 20 (i.e., 1 to 19), we are not reporting Hispanic
representation at this grade level or in this pay plan, as there is an
issue of sensitivity of percentages related to small numbers.
[B] The total number of individuals employed in this category or in
this pay plan ranged from 20 to 50.
[C] SBA did not employ individuals at this grade level or pay plan
during the indicated year.
[D] ES consists of Executives, who are politically appointed agency
leaders paid according to the Executive Schedule.
[E] Other includes those who could not be placed in one of the above
pay plans or grades.
[End of table]
In both 2000 and 2007, Hispanic representation in pay plans/grades 5
through 8, 13, 14, 15, and the SES at SBA exceeded Hispanic
representation governmentwide for these pay plans/grades (see table 2
for Hispanic representation governmentwide by pay plan/grade). From
September 2000 through September 2007, Hispanic representation at SBA
increased in pay plans/grades 13 and SES.
As part of our governmentwide analysis of the diversity of the SES and
the SES developmental pool, we looked more closely at career, or
permanent, SES appointments at federal agencies, including SBA. Table 6
shows the changes in the representation of the career SES at SBA from
October 2000 to September 2007. See appendix I for more information on
career SES diversity at SBA.
Table 6: Changes in the Career SES at SBA:
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: African American;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Number: 10;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Percent: 25.7;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Number: 8;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Percent: 22.3;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Number: -2;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Percent: -3.4.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: American Indian/Alaska
Native;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Number: 0;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Number: 0;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Number: 0;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Percent: 0.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Asian/Pacific Islander;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Number: 0;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Number: 1;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Percent: 2.8;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Number: +1;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Percent: +2.8.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Hispanic;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Number: 3;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Percent: 7.7;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Number: 5;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Percent: 13.9;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Number: +2;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Percent: +6.2.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: White;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Number: 26;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Percent: 66.7;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Number: 22;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Percent: 61.1;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Number: -4;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Percent: -5.6.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Unspecified/other;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Number: 0;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Number: 0;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Number: 0;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Percent: 0.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Total[A];
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Number: 39;
Career SES at SBA: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Number: 36;
Career SES at SBA: September 2007: Percent: 100.0;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Number: -3;
Changes in career SES at SBA: Percent: 0.0.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM's CPDF.
Notes: Governmentwide includes civilian employees of all cabinet-level
departments, independent agencies, commissions, councils, and boards in
the executive branch except the intelligence agencies, the U.S. Postal
Service, and the Foreign Service (as of 2007).
[A] Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
[End of table]
Similar to governmentwide career SES, the two greatest percentage
changes among EEO groups within the career SES at SBA from October 2000
to September 2007 were a decrease among Whites and an increase among
Hispanics. However, with fewer than 40 total SES members, it should be
noted that even small changes will have a notable impact on
representation--for example, as seen in the September 2007 data, an
increase of two Hispanics in the SES from October 2000 to September
2007 resulted in an increase in SES Hispanic representation at SBA from
7.7 percent to 13.9 percent. In addition, unlike the increase in the
number of career SES governmentwide from October 2000 to September
2007, the number of career SES at SBA declined.
We did not analyze the factors that contributed to changes in SBA's
workforce from October 2000 through September 2007. However, OPM and
EEOC in their oversight roles require federal agencies, including SBA,
to analyze their workforces, and both agencies also report on
governmentwide representation levels. Under OPM's regulations
implementing the Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program (FEORP),
[Footnote 15] agencies are required to determine where representation
levels for covered groups are lower than the CLF and take steps to
address those differences. EEOC's Management Directive 715 (MD-715)
provides guidance and standards to federal agencies for establishing
and maintaining effective EEO programs, including a framework for
executive branch agencies to help ensure effective management,
accountability, and self-analysis to determine whether barriers to EEO
exist and to identify and develop strategies to mitigate or eliminate
the barriers to participation.[Footnote 16] Specifically EEOC's MD-715
states that agency personnel programs and policies should be evaluated
regularly to ascertain whether such programs have any barriers that
tend to limit or restrict equitable opportunities for open competition
in the workplace. The initial step is for agencies to analyze their
workforce data with designated benchmarks, including the CLF. If
analysis of their workforce profiles identifies potential barriers,
agencies are to examine all related policies, procedures, and practices
to determine whether an actual barrier exists. EEOC requires agencies
to report the results of their analyses annually.
Table 7 presents changes in SBA's SES developmental pool of GS-15s and
GS-14s.
Table 7: Changes in the SES Developmental Pool at SBA:
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: African American;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000: Number:
77;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Percent: 14.1;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Number: 104;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Percent: 19.2;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Number: +27;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Percent: +5.1.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: American Indian/Alaska
Native;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000: Number:
3;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Percent: 0.5;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Number: 3;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Percent: 0.5;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Number: 0;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Percent: 0.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Asian/Pacific Islander;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000: Number:
17;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Percent: 3.1;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Number: 29;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Percent: 5.4;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Number: +12;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Percent: +2.3.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Hispanic;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000: Number:
38;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Percent: 6.9;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Number: 36;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Percent: 6.7;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Number: -2;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Percent: -0.2.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: White;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000: Number:
413;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Percent: 75.4;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Number: 369;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Percent: 68.2;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Number: -44;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Percent: -7.2.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Unspecified/other;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000: Number:
0;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Percent: 0.0;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Number: 0;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Percent: 0.0;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Number: 0;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Percent: 0.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Total[A];
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000: Number:
548;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): October 2000:
Percent: 100.0;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Number: 541;
SBA's SES developmental pool (GS-15s and GS-14s): September 2007:
Percent: 100.0;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Number: -7;
Changes in SBA's SES developmental pool: Percent: 0.0.
Source: GAO analysis of OPM's CPDF.
Notes: We included GS-15, GS-14, and equivalent employees. GS-
equivalent employees are those in equivalent grades under other pay
plans that follow the GS grade structure and job evaluation methodology
or are equivalent by statute.
[A] Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
[End of table]
Similar to the governmentwide SES developmental pool, the two greatest
percentage changes among EEO groups within SBA's developmental pool
from October 2000 to September 2007 were a decrease among Whites and an
increase among African Americans. Hispanic representation in the SES
developmental pool declined at SBA from October 2000 through September
2007 but remained above Hispanic representation for the governmentwide
SES developmental pool for the same period (see table 4).
As we have previously reported,[Footnote 17] as part of a strategic
human capital planning approach, agencies need to develop long-term
strategies for acquiring, developing, motivating, and retaining staff.
An agency's human capital planning should address the demographic
trends that the agency faces with its workforce, especially
retirements. In 2006, OPM reported that approximately 60 percent of the
executive branch's 1.6 million white-collar employees and 90 percent of
about 6,000 federal executives will be eligible for retirement over the
next 10 years. SBA, like most federal agencies, will face these
challenges.
Rather than simply recreating the existing organization, as we have
previously reported, effective succession planning and management,
linked to the strategic human capital plan, can help an organization
become what it needs to be. Leading organizations go beyond a
"replacement" approach that focuses on identifying particular
individuals as possible successors for specific top-ranking positions.
Rather, they typically engage in broad, integrated succession planning
and management efforts that focus on strengthening both current and
future capacity, anticipating the need for leaders and other key
employees with the necessary competencies to successfully meet the
complex challenges of the 21st century.
In an October 2007 report,[Footnote 18] the SBA Inspector General
identified effective succession planning as a management challenge for
SBA and found that the agency lacked effective human capital strategies
needed to enable SBA to successfully carry out its mission and become a
high performing organization. In its fiscal year 2007 annual
performance report, SBA acknowledged that, among other actions, it
needed to develop a more systematic workforce planning process and to
better align its human capital plans, strategies, and systems to
achieve organizational effectiveness and accomplish its mission. In
fiscal year 2007, SBA reported achieving such outcomes as completing an
occupational skills gap analysis and revising its SES Candidate
Development Program.[Footnote 19] SBA also identified strategies for
fiscal years 2008 and 2009 to further its progress in strategic human
capital management.
In addition, succession planning is tied to the federal government's
opportunity to affect the diversity of the executive corps through new
appointments. In September 2003,[Footnote 20] we reported that agencies
in other countries use succession planning and management to achieve a
more diverse workforce, maintain their leadership capacity, and
increase the retention of high-potential staff. From 1991 through 2001
at SBA, a District Director Candidate Development Program recruited and
developed a diverse group of highly qualified and trained managers at
the GS-15, GS-14, and GS-13 levels to fill district director positions
on a noncompetitive basis as they became vacant.[Footnote 21] An SBA
official stated that over that time the program had over 25 graduates
and that in 2007 SBA expanded the program into a Management Development
Program to fill management and leadership positions.
Chairman Gonzalez, Ranking Member Westmoreland, and Members of the
Subcommittee, this concludes my prepared statement. I would be pleased
to respond to any questions that you may have.
Contacts and Acknowledgments:
For further information regarding this statement, please contact George
Stalcup, Director, Strategic Issues, on (202) 512-6806 or at
stalcupg@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional
Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this
statement. Individuals making key contributions to this statement
included Belva Martin and Kiki Theodoropoulos, Assistant Directors;
Nicholas C. Alexander, Karin Fangman, Jessica Thomsen, and Greg
Wilmoth. Appendix I: Demographic Profiles of Career SES, GS-15, and GS-
14 Employees Governmentwide and at the Small Business Administration.
[End of section]
Appendix I
Demographic Profiles of Career SES, GS-15, and GS-14 Employees
Governmentwide and at the Small Business Administration:
Table 8: Demographic Profiles of Career SES, GS-15, and GS-14 Employees
Governmentwide:
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: African American men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 333;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 5.5;
SES: September 2007: Number: 328;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 5.0;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 1,711;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 3.3;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 2,123;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 3.6;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 3,401;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 4.1;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 4,316;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 4.8.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: African American women'
SES: October 2000: Number: 179;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 2.9;
SES: September 2007: Number: 232;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 3.5;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 1,500;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 2.9;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 2,374;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 4.1;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 4,067;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 4.9;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 6,734;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 7.4.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: American Indian/Alaska Native
men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 54;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.9;
SES: September 2007: Number: 60;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.9;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 278;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 0.5;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 353;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 0.6;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 579;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 0.7;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 585;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 0.6.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: American Indian/Alaska Native
women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 21;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.3;
SES: September 2007: Number: 28;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.4;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 103;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 0.2;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 193;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 0.3;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 294;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 0.4;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 397;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 0.4.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Asian/Pacific Islander men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 70;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 1.1;
SES: September 2007: Number: 96;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 1.5;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 2,063;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 4.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 2,904;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 5.0;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 2,426;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 2.9;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 3,401;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 3.7.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Asian/Pacific Islander women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 33;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.5;
SES: September 2007: Number: 57;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.9;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 836;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 1.6;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 1,604;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 2.8;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 1,036;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 1.2;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 1,899;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 2.1.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Hispanic men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 112;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 1.8;
SES: September 2007: Number: 176;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 2.7;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 1,197;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 2.3;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 1,660;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 2.8;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 2,117;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 2.5;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 2,758;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 3.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Hispanic women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 43;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.7;
SES: September 2007: Number: 60;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.9;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 470;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 0.9;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 760;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 1.3;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 884;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 1.1;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 1,433;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 1.6.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: White men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 4,097;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 67.1;
SES: September 2007: Number: 3,976;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 60.7;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 33,567;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 64.8;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 32,931;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 56.5;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 49,548;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 59.6;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 46,787;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 51.5.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: White women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 1,164;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 19.1;
SES: September 2007: Number: 1,526;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 23.3;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 10,062;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 19.4;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 13,326;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 22.9;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 18,759;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 22.6;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 22,324;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 24.6.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Unspecified/other;
SES: October 2000: Number: 4;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.1;
SES: September 2007: Number: 16;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.2;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 39;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 0.1;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 87;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 0.1;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 75;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 0.1;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 200;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 0.2.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Total[A];
SES: October 2000: Number: 6,110;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
SES: September 2007: Number: 6,555;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 100.0;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 51,826;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 58,315;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 100.0;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 83,186;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 90,834;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 100.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Minorities;
SES: October 2000: Number: 845;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 13.8;
SES: September 2007: Number: 1,037;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 15.8;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 8,158;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 15.7;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 11,971;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 20.5;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 14,804;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 17.8;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 21,523;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 23.7.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 4,666;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 76.4;
SES: September 2007: Number: 4,646;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 70.9;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 38,816;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 74.9;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 40,030;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 68.6;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 58,071;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 69.8;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 57,973;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 63.8.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Minority Men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 569;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 9.3;
SES: September 2007: Number: 660;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 10.1;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 5,249;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 10.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 7,040;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 12.1;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 8,523;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 10.2;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 11,060;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 12.2.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 1,440;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 23.6;
SES: September 2007: Number: 1,909;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 29.1;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 12,971;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 25.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 18,285;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 31.4;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 25,040;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 30.1;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 32,861;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 36.2.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Minority Women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 276;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 4.5;
SES: September 2007: Number: 377;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 5.8;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 2,909;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 5.6;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 4,931;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 8.5;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 6,281;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 7.6;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 10,463;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 11.5.
Source: GAO analysis of the Office of Personnel Management‘s Central
Personnel Data File.
Notes: Governmentwide includes civilian employees of all cabinet-level
departments, independent agencies, commissions, councils, and boards in
the executive branch except the intelligence agencies, the U.S. Postal
Service, and the Foreign Service (as of 2007). We included GS-15, GS-
14, and equivalent employees. GS-equivalent employees are those in
equivalent grades under other pay plans that follow the GS grade
structure and job evaluation methodology or are equivalent by statute.
[A] Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
[End of table]
Table 9: Demographic Profiles of Career SES, GS-15, and GS-14 Employees
at the Small Business Administration:
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: African American men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 6;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 15.4;
SES: September 2007: Number: 6;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 16.7;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 13;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 7.3;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 14;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 7.3;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 26;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 7.0;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 24;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 6.9.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: African American women'
SES: October 2000: Number: 4;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 10.3;
SES: September 2007: Number: 2;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 5.6;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 11;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 6.1;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 21;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 10.9;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 27;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 7.3;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 45;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 12.9.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: American Indian/Alaska Native
men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 0;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
SES: September 2007: Number: 0;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 3;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 1.7;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 2;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 1.0;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 0;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 1;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 0.3.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: American Indian/Alaska Native
women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 0;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
SES: September 2007: Number: 0;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 0;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 0;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 0;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 0;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 0.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Asian/Pacific Islander men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 0;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
SES: September 2007: Number: 0;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 2;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 1.1;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 5;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 2.6;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 8;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 2.2;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 7;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 2.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Asian/Pacific Islander women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 0;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
SES: September 2007: Number: 1;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 2.8;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 0;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 3;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 1.6;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 7;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 1.9;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 14;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 4.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Hispanic men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 2;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 5.1;
SES: September 2007: Number: 4;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 11.1;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 11;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 6.1;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 11;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 5.7;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 13;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 3.5;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 6;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 1.7.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Hispanic women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 1;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 2.6;
SES: September 2007: Number: 1;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 2.8;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 4;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 2.2;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 6;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 3.1;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 10;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 2.7;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 13;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 3.7.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: White men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 18;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 46.2;
SES: September 2007: Number: 16;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 44.4;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 99;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 55.3;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 96;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 49.7;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 186;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 50.4;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 155;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 44.5.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: White women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 8;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 20.5;
SES: September 2007: Number: 6;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 16.7;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 36;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 20.1;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 35;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 18.1;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 92;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 24.9;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 83;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 23.9.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Unspecified/other;
SES: October 2000: Number: 0;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
SES: September 2007: Number: 0;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 0;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 0;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 0.0;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 0;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 0.0;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 00;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 0.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Total[A];
SES: October 2000: Number: 39;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
SES: September 2007: Number: 36;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 100.0;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 179;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 193;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 100.0;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 369;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 100.0;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 348;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 100.0.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Minorities;
SES: October 2000: Number: 13;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 33.3;
SES: September 2007: Number: 14;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 15.8;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 44;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 24.6;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 62;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 32.1;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 91;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 24.7;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 110;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 31.6.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 26;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 66.7;
SES: September 2007: Number: 26;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 72.2;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 128;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 71.5;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 128;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 66.3;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 233;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 63.1;
GS-14: September 2007: Number:193;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 55.5.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Minority Men;
SES: October 2000: Number: 8;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 20.5;
SES: September 2007: Number: 10;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 27.8;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 29;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 16.2;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 32;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 16.6;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 47;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 12.7;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 38;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 10.9.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 13;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 33.3;
SES: September 2007: Number: 10;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 27.8;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 51;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 28.5;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 65;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 33.7;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 136;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 36.9;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 155;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 44.5.
Equal employment opportunity (EEO) group: Minority Women;
SES: October 2000: Number: 5;
SES: October 2000: Percent: 12.8;
SES: September 2007: Number: 4;
SES: September 2007: Percent: 11.1;
GS-15: October 2000: Number: 15;
GS-15: October 2000: Percent: 8.4;
GS-15: September 2007: Number: 30;
GS-15: September 2007: Percent: 15.5;
GS-14: October 2000: Number: 44;
GS-14: October 2000: Percent: 11.9;
GS-14: September 2007: Number: 72;
GS-14: September 2007: Percent: 20.7.
Source: GAO analysis of the Office of Personnel Management‘s Central
Personnel Data File.
Note: We included GS-15, GS-14, and equivalent employees. GS-equivalent
employees are those in equivalent grades under other pay plans that
follow the GS grade structure and job evaluation methodology or are
equivalent by statute.
[A] Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.
[End of table]
[End of appendix]
Footnotes:
[1] GAO, Human Capital: Diversity in the Federal SES and Senior Levels
of the U.S. Postal Service and Processes for Selecting New Executives,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-08-609T]
(Washington, D.C.: Apr. 3, 2008).
[2] GAO,The Federal Workforce: Additional Insights Could Enhance Agency
Efforts Related to Hispanic Representation, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06-832] (Washington, D.C.:
Aug. 17, 2006).
[3] GAO,Data on Hispanic Representation in the Federal Workforce,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-493R]
(Washington, D.C.: May 18, 2007).
[4] The CLF is defined as those 16 and older (including federal
workers), regardless of citizenship, who are employed or looking for
work and are not in the military or institutionalized. A minimum age of
18 years is required for most federal employment.
[5] In 2005, Hispanics who were United States citizens comprised 7.6
percent of the CLF.
[6] OPM's percentages are based on the permanent, or career, federal
workforce. Including both career and noncareer employees results in
governmentwide Hispanic representation of 7.7 percent for 2007.
[7] See [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-08-609T]
for a fuller discussion of the reliability of CPDF data.
[8] Governmentwide data on Hispanic representation include permanent
and nonpermanent employees.
[9] The CFO Act agencies are 24 major executive agencies that are
subject to the CFO Act. In 2006, the CFO Act agencies employed 98
percent of federal employees. Pub. L. No. 101-576, 104 Stat. 2838 (Nov.
15, 1990), as amended.
[10] It should be noted that the loss of Hispanic employees at the
Department of Justice could have been the result of staff
reorganization because of the formation of the Department of Homeland
Security, which was created in March 2003 and which exceeded the fiscal
year 7.7 governmentwide percentage of Hispanic representation.
[11] Career SES members are individuals with civil service status
(permanent) who are appointed competitively to SES positions and serve
in positions below the top political appointees in the executive branch
of government. See [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-08-609T].
[12] We included GS-15, GS-14, and equivalent employees. GS-equivalent
employees are those in equivalent grades under other pay plans that
follow the GS grade structure and job evaluation methodology or are
equivalent by statute.
[13] See Title II of Public Law 163, 67 Stat. 232 (July 30, 1953)
(codified as amended at 15 U.S.C. §§ 631 et seq.)
[14] According to SBA, its permanent staff in fiscal year 2007 equaled
2,531, and temporary staff equaled 2,525.
[15] 5 U.S.C. § 7201 and 5 C.F.R. Part 720, Subpart B.
[16] EEOC defines barriers as agency policies, principles, or practices
that limit or tend to limit employment opportunities for those of a
particular gender, race, or ethnic background or based on an
individual's disability status.
[17] GAO, Human Capital: Federal Workforce Challenges in the 21st
Century, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-556T]
(Washington, D.C.: Mar. 6, 2007).
[18] U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Inspector General,
Fiscal Year 2008 Report on the Most Serious Management and Performance
Challenges Facing the Small Business Administration, Report No. 08-01
(Washington, D.C.: Oct. 16, 2007).
[19] The last SBA SES Candidate Development Program was completed in
fiscal year 2004.
[20] GAO, Human Capital: Insights for U.S. Agencies from Other
Countries' Succession Planning and Management Initiatives, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-03-914] (Washington, D.C.:
Sept. 15, 2003).
[21] At SBA, district director positions are key managerial career
positions responsible for providing agency services to the small
business community.
[End of section]
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Mail or Phone:
The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent.
Orders should be sent to:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room LM:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
To order by Phone:
Voice: (202) 512-6000:
TDD: (202) 512-2537:
Fax: (202) 512-6061:
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, D.C. 20548: