Social Security Administration Needs To Protect Against Possible Conflicts of Interest in Its Disability Programs

Gao ID: HRD-83-65 June 10, 1983

In response to a congressional request, GAO conducted a survey of the consultative examination process used by the Social Security Administration (SSA) to make disability benefit eligibility determinations.

GAO identified a loophole in SSA policies whereby physicians who are working for various state disability determination services (DDS) and under contract to SSA are prohibited from performing consultative examinations but are permitted to have familial or financial interests in firms or organizations that do perform these examinations. SSA policy pertaining to physician independence states that all implications of possible conflicts of interest must be avoided. GAO believes that this policy should be strengthened and enforced. As a result of the current policy, a situation existed in the SSA Chicago regional office where the Chief Regional Medical Advisor and one other medical consultant were associated with a firm which received almost $2 million in 1982 for performing consultative examinations. While these arrangements were approved in advance by SSA and did not violate government standards of ethics, they did create a conflict of interest. Both medical consultants recently terminated their contracts with SSA.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: Joseph F. Delfico Team: General Accounting Office: Human Resources Division Phone: (202) 512-7215


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.