Welfare Reform

Many States Continue Some Federal or State Benefits for Immigrants Gao ID: HEHS-98-132 July 31, 1998

Although welfare reform allowed states to drop immigrants from their welfare rolls, most states have opted to provide some welfare benefits to part of this population. Nearly all states have chosen to continue providing federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families and Medicaid benefits to prereform immigrants as well as provide these benefits to new immigrants after five years of U.S. residency. About one-third of the states use state funds to provide similar benefits to some new immigrants during the five-year bar. The greatest economic impact of welfare reform for most of these immigrants is the loss of food stamps. After the implementation of food stamp restrictions, an estimated 940,000 immigrants who had received food stamps in 1997 were no longer eligible to receive them. Almost one-fifth of this group consisted of immigrant children. With the implementation of the welfare reform restrictions for immigrants, state and local governments face added responsibilities. States' future challenges include verifying the citizenship or immigration status of applicants for all federal public benefits and enforcing affidavits of support for new immigrants sponsored by relatives.

GAO noted that: (1) although the states could have dropped immigrants from their welfare rolls, most states have chosen to provide some welfare benefit to part of this population; (2) nearly all states have chosen to continue providing federal TANF and Medicaid benefits to pre-reform immigrants and to provide these benefits to new immigrants after 5 years of U.S. residency; (3) about a third of the states use state funds to provide similar benefits to some new immigrants during the 5-year bar; (4) among these states are 6 of the 10 where most immigrants live--2 states provide state-funded medical assistance and 4 states provide both state-funded cash and medical assistance; (5) with the states' continuation of TANF and Medicaid benefits to pre-reform immigrants and the retention of these immigrants' SSI benefits, the greatest economic impact of welfare reform for most of these immigrants is the loss of federally funded food stamp benefits; (6) after the implementation of the food stamp restrictions, an estimated 940,000 immigrants receiving food stamps in 1997 lost eligibility for receiving them; (7) almost one-fifth of this group consisted of immigrant children; (8) at the time of GAO's review, 14 states had created state-funded food stamp programs serving about a quarter of this immigrant group nationwide--primarily children, the disabled, and the elderly; (9) fewer states, however, offer state-funded food stamps to new immigrants; (10) the most recent legislation will restore food stamp eligibility to an estimated 250,000 immigrants, mostly children, the disabled, and the elderly, the same groups targeted by state-funded food stamp programs; (11) states' responses to the restoring of these benefits, such as changing eligibility for state-funded programs, are unknown at this time; (12) with the implementation of the welfare reform restrictions for immigrants, states and local governments face added responsibilities; (13) states' future challenges include verifying the citizenship or immigration status of applicants for all federal public benefits and enforcing affidavits of support for new immigrants sponsored by relatives; (14) the states GAO visited anticipated major systems changes and other additional work to implement the new verification procedures; (15) furthermore, states choosing to provide assistance to immigrants no longer eligible for federal benefits are uncertain about future funding for these programs; and (16) these states also face additional challenges managing funding streams and determining eligibility for federal and state programs.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.