Savings to CHAMPUS From Requirement To Use Uniformed Services Hospitals

Gao ID: HRD-79-24 December 29, 1978

If a military dependent needs nonemergency hospital care and lives within a 40-mile radius of a military hospital, the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS) requires that when available, the patient use the military rather than public hospital facilities in order for the expenses to be covered by the government. This cost savings measure is in jeapordy, however, if the trend toward a decrease in the number of military medical personnel continues. Exceptions to the rule have been made in cases when the travel distance exceeds the 40-mile limit, the traveling would prove to be a hardship to the patient, or when the needed medical facilities are not available at a military installation.

If the Department of Defense (DOD) assessment of the military's future physician staffing problems is accurate, GAO feels that even with better program management, possibilities for increased savings from the CHAMPUS program are limited. In many instances, individuals do not make use of the military facilities because of a lack of knowledge of the program requirements or because of loopholes in the regulations. An example is the nonavailability statement required before a patient uses a private facility because adequate care is not available at the nearby military hospital. This is often signed after the patient has been to the outside physician and, in some cases, without checking on the availability of care by the military. Regulations also allow a patient who has been under the care of a private physician to continue, even if a military hospital is nearby. This concept has been used by patients to circumvent the CHAMPUS regulations.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.