Full Potential To Achieve Savings by Investing in Fast Payback Productivity Enhancing Capital Equipment Not Realized

Gao ID: FGMSD-78-44 July 25, 1978

The Department of Defense's (DOD) fast payback productivity-enhancing capital-investment program was an attempt at: (1) improving the fairness with which relatively low-value productivity-enhancing equipment competes for public funds; and (2) eliminating the long approval leadtime associated with the annual budget review process. The program was begun in 1973 to take advantage of the relatively low-value investment opportunities that were being lost because no provisions were made to fund them as they occurred. Under the program, productivity-enhancing investments are separated from others for special consideration, and qualified investments are to be financed quickly. DOD officials have included $l3.5 million for the program in the 1979 budget request.

The basic concept of the program is sound and should be supported. The program enables DOD to finance productivity-enhancing investment opportunities that may not be funded because they were not provided for in the budget and, if not obtained quickly, could result in a significant loss of savings. The program has not, however, realized its full potential to achieve savings. For the fast payback program to achieve its full potential, management needs to: insure maximum identification of investment opportunities, improve the justification and approval process, and insure adequate postanalysis/followup evaluations. Problems in the program include: insufficient assignment of priority to the identification of capital investments; reluctance of managers to utilize the program because of lack of incentives; invalid and unsupportable justifications due to erroneous, incomplete, and undocumented economic analyses; independent review of investment justifications not conducted prior to approval; and inadequate monitoring and inaccurate reporting of savings.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.