Defense Logistics
More Efficient Use of Active RFID Tags Could Potentially Avoid Millions in Unnecessary Purchases Gao ID: GAO-06-366R March 8, 2006For many years, the Department of Defense (DOD) has been attempting to improve visibility over its inventory and equipment. The lack of visibility over inventory and equipment shipments increases vulnerability to undetected loss or theft and substantially heightens the risk that millions of dollars will be spent unnecessarily. Additionally, needed supplies may not reach the warfighter when needed, which may impair readiness. In order to improve visibility, DOD began using a technology to enable it to track shipments. This technology is known as radio frequency identification (RFID). RFID technology consists of active or passive electronic tags that are attached to equipment and supplies that are shipped from one location to another. This technology is part of a family of automatic information technologies used to enable hands-off identification of cargo and inventory. This report focuses on active RFID tags, which cost around $100 each and are reusable. DOD has been using active RFID technology since the early 1990s to help with in-transit visibility of shipments, and, as of January 2005, it officially began to implement the use of passive RFID. During the course of our work on the use and implementation of passive RFID technology in DOD, we observed that active RFID tags were not being routinely returned for reuse. This report discusses DOD's efficiency in managing the reuse of active RFID tags, specifically the effectiveness of DOD's RFID policy and the extent of tag reuse and monitoring. DOD's final RFID policy was issued by the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics), the defense logistics executive for RFID implementation, on July 30, 2004.
DOD's use of active RFID tags can be more efficiently managed, potentially avoiding millions of dollars in unnecessary tag purchases. DOD's current RFID policy does not require active tags to be returned or reused even though these tags are designed for repeated reuse. DOD's July 30, 2004, RFID policy governing active RFID tag return and reuse only "encourages" components to return active RFID tags for reuse. The policy does not specifically direct that active tags be returned for reuse or require military services and other users to reuse tags. Estimates of tag reuse by DOD component officials and DOD tag reuse data as of May 2005 indicate that the majority of active RFID tags had not been returned or reused more than twice. For example, Army and DLA officials estimate that 10 percent of active tags were being returned for reuse before Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom and only 3 percent after. Moreover, during the period May 2002 through May 2005, DOD active tag use data for 614,681 tags show that 84 percent of the tags (514,455 tags) had been used only one or two times. Only 16 percent of the tags (100,226 tags) were reported as being reused more than twice. Furthermore, DOD does not routinely monitor or account for reuse of all active RFID tags because it has not developed procedures to do this. Officials from the Army and DLA--the largest purchasers of active RFID tags--informed us that they are unaware of the status or location of the majority of previously used tags. Nonetheless, DOD continues to spend millions of dollars purchasing active RFID tags without having procedures to determine whether the purchase of new tags is needed or whether the demand could be met through reuse of existing tags. If the 84 percent reuse rate is applied to DOD's total tag purchases since December 1997, around 1,101,816 tags, valued at over $110 million, have been used only one or two times and are in an unknown status, even though these tags could potentially be reused. Without greater efficiency in the reuse of active RFID tags, DOD could spend millions of dollars for unnecessary purchases.
RecommendationsOur recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.
Director: Team: Phone:GAO-06-366R, Defense Logistics: More Efficient Use of Active RFID Tags Could Potentially Avoid Millions in Unnecessary Purchases
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-06-366R
entitled 'Defense Logistics: More Efficient Use of Active RFID Tags
Could Potentially Avoid Millions in Unnecessary Purchases' which was
released on March 9, 2006.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
March 08, 2006:
The Honorable Donald H. Rumsfeld:
Secretary of Defense:
Subject: Defense Logistics: More Efficient Use of Active RFID Tags
Could Potentially Avoid Millions in Unnecessary Purchases:
Dear Mr. Secretary:
For many years, the Department of Defense (DOD) has been attempting to
improve visibility over its inventory and equipment. The lack of
visibility over inventory and equipment shipments increases
vulnerability to undetected loss or theft and substantially heightens
the risk that millions of dollars will be spent unnecessarily.
Additionally, needed supplies may not reach the warfighter when needed,
which may impair readiness. In order to improve visibility, DOD began
using a technology to enable it to track shipments. This technology is
known as radio frequency identification (RFID). RFID technology
consists of active or passive electronic tags that are attached to
equipment and supplies that are shipped from one location to another.
This technology is part of a family of automatic information
technologies used to enable hands-off identification of cargo and
inventory. This report focuses on active RFID tags, which cost around
$100 each and are reusable.
DOD has been using active RFID technology since the early 1990s to help
with in-transit visibility of shipments, and, as of January 2005, it
officially began to implement the use of passive RFID. During the
course of our work on the use and implementation of passive RFID
technology in DOD,[Footnote 1] we observed that active RFID tags were
not being routinely returned for reuse. This report discusses DOD's
efficiency in managing the reuse of active RFID tags, specifically the
effectiveness of DOD's RFID policy and the extent of tag reuse and
monitoring. DOD's final RFID policy was issued by the Under Secretary
of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics), the defense
logistics executive for RFID implementation, on July 30, 2004.
For this report, we reviewed DOD's July 30, 2004, RFID implementation
policy and its concept of operations guidance for DOD components, and
interviewed knowledgeable officials from the Defense Logistics Agency
(DLA); the Army Program Executive Office, Enterprise Information
Systems, Product Manager Joint-Automatic Identification Technology
Office; the Navy; the Air Force; and the U.S. Transportation Command.
Although we did not verify the data provided, we determined that the
data used were sufficiently reliable for the purposes of this report.
We conducted this assignment in conjunction with our work on passive
RFID from July 2004 through January 2006 in accordance with generally
accepted government auditing standards. Our scope and methodology are
discussed in further detail at the end of this report.
Results in Brief:
DOD's use of active RFID tags can be more efficiently managed,
potentially avoiding millions of dollars in unnecessary tag purchases.
DOD's current RFID policy does not require active tags to be returned
or reused even though these tags are designed for repeated reuse. DOD's
July 30, 2004, RFID policy governing active RFID tag return and reuse
only "encourages" components to return active RFID tags for reuse. The
policy does not specifically direct that active tags be returned for
reuse or require military services and other users to reuse tags.
Estimates of tag reuse by DOD component officials and DOD tag reuse
data as of May 2005 indicate that the majority of active RFID tags had
not been returned or reused more than twice. For example, Army and DLA
officials estimate that 10 percent of active tags were being returned
for reuse before Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom and only
3 percent after. Moreover, during the period May 2002 through May 2005,
DOD active tag use data for 614,681 tags show that 84 percent of the
tags (514,455 tags) had been used only one or two times. Only 16
percent of the tags (100,226 tags) were reported as being reused more
than twice. Furthermore, DOD does not routinely monitor or account for
reuse of all active RFID tags because it has not developed procedures
to do this. Officials from the Army and DLA--the largest purchasers of
active RFID tags--informed us that they are unaware of the status or
location of the majority of previously used tags. Nonetheless, DOD
continues to spend millions of dollars purchasing active RFID tags
without having procedures to determine whether the purchase of new tags
is needed or whether the demand could be met through reuse of existing
tags. If the 84 percent reuse rate is applied to DOD's total tag
purchases since December 1997,[Footnote 2] around 1,101,816 tags,
valued at over $110 million, have been used only one or two times and
are in an unknown status, even though these tags could potentially be
reused. Without greater efficiency in the reuse of active RFID tags,
DOD could spend millions of dollars for unnecessary purchases.
We are recommending that DOD revise its RFID policy and operational
guidance to require that active tags be returned for reuse and to
develop procedures to track and monitor use of RFID tags. In commenting
on a draft of this report, DOD concurred with our first recommendation
and partially concurred with our second recommendation. DOD stated that
it will issue additional guidance on tag reuse by July 2006. DOD's
comments and our evaluation are discussed in detail at the end of this
report.
Background:
DOD began implementing active RFID technology in the mid-1990s with
Army initiatives to better identify and manage its total assets,
including those in transit to the warfighter. Active RFID technology is
used on containers and major pieces of equipment for tracking shipments
and their contents while in transit over long distances. Active RFID
tags, which generally use a battery, have transmitters that transmit
information through radio signals that are read electronically. Active
RFID tags hold relatively large amounts of data so they are capable of
storing detailed manifest and transportation data. Active RFID tags
cost around $100 each and are reusable. By using active RFID tags and
associated infrastructure, DOD has sought to improve its capability to
see timely and accurate information on military units' strategic
deployments, troop sustainment cargo, military units' intra-theater
movements, and non-military unit cargo movements within the United
States. Active RFID technology was used to track parts and supplies
shipped to and within theater during Operation Iraqi Freedom, although
not entirely successfully because some of the same problems that
occurred during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm were
repeated, as we have previously reported and other DOD and military
service after-action studies have documented.[Footnote 3]
Active RFID Tags Can Be More Efficiently Managed:
DOD's use of active RFID tags can be more efficiently managed,
potentially avoiding millions of dollars in unnecessary tag purchases.
DOD's current RFID policy does not require active tags to be returned
or reused; DOD tag reuse data indicate that few active RFID tags have
been returned or reused more than twice, and DOD does not routinely
monitor reuse of or account for all active RFID tags.
DOD Policy Does Not Require Return or Reuse of Active Tags:
DOD's current policy on RFID does not require active RFID tags to be
returned or reused. DOD's July 30, 2004, policy governing the return
and reuse of active RFID tags "encourages" components to return these
tags for reuse through the Defense Logistics Management Supplement
Materiel Returns Program to receive reimbursement of certain
costs.[Footnote 4] The policy also states that the services and other
requisitioners and users "may opt" to establish their own retail
operations for used tags. The policy, however, does not specifically
direct that active tags be returned for reuse or require military
services and other users to reuse tags.
Few Active Tags Have Been Returned or Reused:
Army, Navy, Air Force, U.S. Transportation Command, and DLA officials
informed us that few active RFID tags were being returned or reused.
Army and DLA officials estimated that rates of tag returns had been 10
percent before Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom, and 3
percent after. DOD tag use data for the period May 2002 through May
2005, for 614,681 active RFID tags, shows that the majority of the tags
(514,455 tags, or 84 percent) were used one or two times, while a small
percentage of the tags (100,226 tags, or 16 percent) were reported to
have been reused on more than two occasions. These data indicate that
about 61 percent (372,863) of these active RFID tags had been used one
time, and 23 percent (141,592) of them had been used twice. The
remaining 16 percent (100,226 tags) had been used on more than two
occasions, ranging from 3 to 51 times.
DOD Does Not Routinely Monitor or Account for Reuse of Active Tags:
The military services and DLA do not routinely monitor or account for
the return and reuse of active RFID tags because there are no
procedures in place to do so.[Footnote 5] For example, U.S.
Transportation Command and Air Force officials told us that they could
not account for active RFID tags after the tags have been used because
they use the tags as if they were consumable or expendable items that
have a one-time use. Furthermore, officials from the Army and DLA--the
largest purchasers of active RFID tags--said that they were unaware of
the status or location of the majority of previously used active RFID
tags. However, active RFID tags were designed to be reused, and DOD's
RFID policy acknowledges the economic benefits of reusing these tags.
DLA officials explained that active tags are lost or even discarded,
which they recognized was not an economical practice. DOD nonetheless
continues to spend millions of dollars purchasing large quantities of
active RFID tags without having procedures to determine whether the
purchase of new tags is needed or whether the demand could be met
through reuse of existing tags.
DOD's purchases of active RFID tags have increased significantly in
recent years. Between December 1997 and early June 2005, as shown in
table 1, DOD purchased over 1.3 million active RFID tags, with an
average unit purchase price per tag of about $100. DOD's May 2002
through 2005 tag use data indicate that 84 percent of active tags are
used only one or two times. If this reuse rate is applied to the total
active RFID tags DOD has purchased since December 1997, this means that
1,101,816 tags, valued at over $110 million, have been used only one or
two times and are in an unknown status. These tags could potentially be
reused if DOD revised its policy to require reuse of active tags.
Table 1: DOD Active RFID Tag Purchases from December 1997 through June
3, 2005:
Calendar year: 1997[A];
Quantity purchased: 10[A];
Purchase costs: $1,400[A].
Calendar year: 1998;
Quantity purchased: 23,762;
Purchase costs: $3,755,732.
Calendar year: 1999;
Quantity purchased: 78,145;
Purchase costs: $12,581,345.
Calendar year: 2000;
Quantity purchased: 27,836;
Purchase costs: $3,857,648.
Calendar year: 2001;
Quantity purchased: 27,733;
Purchase costs: $3,267,352.
Calendar year: 2002;
Quantity purchased: 58,286;
Purchase costs: $5,747,210.
Calendar year: 2003;
Quantity purchased: 366,841;
Purchase costs: $35,212,123.
Calendar year: 2004;
Quantity purchased: 475,717;
Purchase costs: $47,085,115.
Calendar year: 2005[B];
Quantity purchased: 253,356[B];
Purchase costs: $19,381,778[B].
Total;
Quantity purchased: 1,311,686;
Purchase costs: $130,889,703.
Average purchase price per tag: $99.79.
Source: GAO analysis of data provided by Army Program Executive Office,
Enterprise Information Systems, Product Manager Joint - Automatic
Identification Technology Office.
[A] Data for 1997 reflects purchase quantities in December 1997.
[B] Data for 2005 reflects purchase quantities from January 1, 2005,
through June 3, 2005.
[End of table]
If DOD had more effective policies and procedures governing the reuse
of active RFID tags, including procedures to track and monitor use, it
might avoid millions of dollars in unnecessary purchases.
Conclusions:
DOD spends millions of dollars annually purchasing active RFID tags,
which are designed for repeated reuse, but most are not being reused by
DOD routinely. In the absence of a policy requirement to return or
reuse active RFID tags, DOD components may continue to treat these tags
as expendable items and may not return or reuse the tags. Without
improved procedures to track and monitor tag reuse, DOD and its
components are likely to continue to invest heavily in the purchase of
active RFID tags without knowing how many new tags are actually needed
to meet overall goals, objectives, and strategies. If active tags were
returned for reuse, and effective procedures established to monitor and
track reuse of these tags, DOD could be more efficient in its use of
existing tags and could avoid unnecessary future purchases of active
RFID tags.
Recommendations for Executive Action:
We recommend that the Secretary of Defense direct the Under Secretary
of Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics) to take the
following two actions:
* Modify the July 30, 2004, RFID policy and other operational guidance
to require that active RFID tags be returned for reuse or be reused by
the military services and other users.
* Direct the secretaries of each military service and administrators of
other components to establish procedures to track and monitor the use
of active RFID tags, to include:
- determining requirements for the number of tags needed,
- compiling an accurate inventory of the number of tags currently
owned, and:
- establishing procedures to monitor and track tags, including
purchases, reuse, losses, repairs, and any other categories that would
assist management's oversight of these tags.
Agency Comments and Our Evaluation:
In written comments on a draft of this report, DOD concurred with our
first recommendation to modify its RFID policy and guidance on active
RFID tag return and reuse, and partially concurred with our second
recommendation to require the services and other tag users to develop
procedures to track and monitor use of active RFID tags. DOD's written
comments are reprinted in their entirety in enclosure I.
DOD concurred with our recommendation to modify the July 30, 2004, RFID
policy and other operational guidance to require that active RFID tags
be returned for reuse or be reused by the military services and other
users. The department stated that it recognizes the importance of
reusing these tags to the maximum extent possible and that its policy
establishes procedures for the return of tags. DOD also stated that its
policy implicitly addresses that these tags should be reused at the
local level and, when no longer required for local reuse, the policy
directs that the tags be returned to the wholesale level for reuse. We
disagree that DOD's RFID policy specifically directs components to
return tags to the wholesale level for reuse. The existing policy only
"encourages" components to use the Defense Logistics Management
Supplement Materiel Returns Program to return tags no longer required
and receive reimbursement for packaging, crating, handling, and
transportation costs. The department stated that it will issue
additional guidance on tag reuse by July 2006. The department said that
its July 30, 2004, RFID policy will be institutionalized in the next
update of the DOD 4140.1-R, DOD Supply Chain Materiel Management
Regulation, in fiscal year 2007, which will make explicit reference to
reuse of the tags. We believe that this action will satisfy our
recommendation if the explicit reference in the updated policy guidance
actually requires the services and other users to return tags for reuse
or to reuse tags locally.
DOD partially concurred with our second recommendation directing the
secretaries of each military service and administrators of other
components to establish procedures to track and monitor the use of
active RFID tags to include (1) determining requirements for the number
of tags needed; (2) compiling an accurate inventory of the number of
tags currently owned; and (3) establishing procedures to monitor and
track tags, including purchases, reuse, losses, repairs, and any other
categories that would assist management's oversight of these tags. The
department stated, as it said when concurring with our first
recommendation, that it will direct the military services and U.S.
Transportation Command to develop procedures by July 2006 to address
the reuse of tags as well as procedures for return of the tags no
longer required. The department also stated that active tag reuse is
monitored by the Army Program Executive Office, Enterprise Information
Systems, Product Manager Joint - Automatic Identification Technology
Office and reports are generated that provide last tag read locations.
The department said that it will ensure the components are aware of
this capability so that they may better use these reports in managing
RFID tag use. The department further stated that although many tags
have been written to only once, there may be legitimate operational
reasons for these occurrences and that the Office of the Assistant
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense and the components will investigate
the causes for low instances of tag reuse and the business processes
contributing to the low reuse of tags.
The department, however, disagreed with the need to establish
procedures to account for procurement, inventory, repairs, or losses of
existing tags. It stated that active RFID tags are consumable items.
Nonetheless, we continue to believe that DOD can potentially avoid
millions of dollars in unnecessary active RFID tag purchases if the
department and its components would establish accountability procedures
to track and monitor active tag requirements, inventory, purchases,
reuse, losses, and repairs as we recommended. DOD's July 20, 2004, RFID
policy does not define active RFID tags as consumable items. Also, its
policy emphasizes the capability of active tags to be reused and to
even be refurbished. Moreover, the capability of active RFID tags to be
reused would seem to preclude these tags from meeting DOD's definition
of a "consumable item." For example, DOD regulation 4140.1-R defines a
consumable item as "[a]n item of supply (except explosive ordnance and
major end items of equipment) that is normally expended or used up
beyond recovery in the use for which it is designed or intended."
Because active RFID tags can be reused, they are not expended or used
up beyond recovery, and thus we do not believe that they should be
treated as consumable items in general operating environments.
Consequently, we continue to believe our recommendation is merited and
DOD should develop procedures to track and monitor its use of active
RFID tags so that it has a sound basis for determining its current and
future requirements and procurement actions for active RFID tags.
Scope and Methodology:
To evaluate DOD's reuse of active RFID tags, we relied on data gathered
through our visits and interviews with key personnel within DLA; the
Army Program Executive Office, Enterprise Information Systems, Product
Manager Joint - Automatic Identification Technology Office; the Navy;
the Air Force; and the U.S. Transportation Command. We reviewed DOD's
RFID implementation policy and its concept of operations guidance for
DOD components, and we obtained briefings to understand DOD's strategy
for implementing active RFID technology into its supply chain
processes. Additionally, we visited and observed the use of active RFID
technology at DLA's Defense Distribution Depot in Susquehanna,
Pennsylvania, and the Norfolk Ocean Terminal initiative at the Navy's
Fleet and Industrial Supply Center in Norfolk, Virginia. Although we
did not verify the data provided, we determined that the data used were
sufficiently reliable for the purposes of this review. Subsequent to
our exit meeting, DOD provided us with a snapshot of active RFID tag
reuse data covering May 2002 through May 2005. Because these new data
were provided after audit work was completed, we did not assess their
accuracy or examine the methodology by which the data were collected.
We conducted our work in conjunction with our work on passive RFID from
July 2004 to January 2006 in accordance with generally accepted
government auditing standards.
We are sending copies of this report to the appropriate congressional
committees; the Secretaries of the Army, Air Force, and the Navy; the
Commandant of the Marine Corps; the Commander, U.S. Transportation
Command; and the Director, Defense Logistics Agency. We will also make
copies available to others upon request. In addition, the report will
be available at no charge on the GAO Web site at http://www.gao.gov.
Please contact me at (202) 512-8365 or solisw@gao.gov if you or your
staff have any questions concerning this report. Contact points for our
Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on
the last page of this report. Key contributors to this report were
David A. Schmitt, Assistant Director; Renee S. Brown; James A.
Driggins; Jeffrey R. Hubbard; Shvetal Khanna; Nicole Harms; Louis V.
Modliszewski; Kenneth E. Patton; Charles W. Perdue; Keith A. Rhodes;
Dudley C. Roache, Jr; Yong Song; and Cheryl A. Weissman.
Sincerely yours,
Signed by:
William M. Solis, Director:
Defense Capabilities and Management:
[End of section]
Enclosure:
Comments from the Department of Defense:
DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR LOGISTICS AND MATERIEL READINESS:
3500 DEFENSE PENTAGON:
WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3500:
FEB 16 2006:
Mr. William Solis:
Director, Defense Capabilities and Management:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street, N.W.:
Washington, DC 20548:
Dear Mr. Solis:
This is the Department of Defense (DoD) response to the GAO Draft
Report GAO-06-366R, "DEFENSE LOGISTICS: More Efficient Use of Active
RFID Tags Could Potentially Avoid Millions in Unnecessary Purchases,"
dated January 18, 2006 (GAO CODE 350690, Spin-off of GAO Code 350561).
The Department concurs with Recommendation 1 and partially concurs with
Recommendation 2. Attachment 1 contains our detailed response.
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is a critical transformational
technology that will be deployed across the Department over the next
several years. The Department is striving to ensure efficient
utilization of active RFID tags and will ensure each component has
developed internal operating procedures no later than July 2006 to
address the issues identified in this report.
The Department appreciates the opportunity to comment on this audit.
Should additional information be required, Mrs. Kathy Smith of my staff
is the point of contact. She may be reached at (703) 604-0098x135.
Sincerely,
Signed by:
Jack Bell:
Attachments: As Stated:
GAO DRAFT REPORT - DATED JANUARY 18, 2006 GAO CODE 350690/GAO-06-366R:
"DEFENSE LOGISTICS: More Efficient Use of Active RFID Tags Could
Potentially Avoid Millions in Unnecessary Purchases"
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE COMMENTS TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS:
RECOMMENDATION 1: The GAO recommended that the Secretary of the Defense
direct the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and
Logistics) to modify the July 30, 2004 RFID policy and other
operational guidance to require that active RFID tags be returned for
reuse or be reused by the military services and other users. (page
7/GAO Draft Report):
DOD RESPONSE: The Department concurs with this recommendation. The
Department recognizes the importance of reusing these tags to the
maximum extent possible and the July 30, 2004 policy sets forth
procedures for the return of the tags that are no longer required.
Implicit in the policy is that these tags should be reused at the local
level and, when no longer required for local reuse, the policy then
directs that the tags be returned to the wholesale level for reuse.
While the current policy addresses reuse implicitly, the Department
will issue additional guidance on reuse by July 2006. When the July 30,
2004 RFID policy is institutionalized in the next update of the DoD
4140.1-R, DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Regulation, in FY07, we
will also make explicit reference to reuse of the tags.
RECOMMENDATION 2: The GAO recommended that the Secretary of the Defense
direct the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology and
Logistics) to direct the secretaries of each military service and
administrators of other components to establish procedures to track and
monitor the use of active RFID tags, to include:
* determining requirements for the number of tags needed,
* compiling an accurate inventory of the number of tags currently
owned, and:
* establishing procedures to monitor and track tags, including
purchases, reuse, losses, repairs, and any other categories that would
assist management's oversight of these tags. (page 7/GAO Draft Report):
DOD RESPONSE: The Department partially concurs with this
recommendation. The Department will direct the Military Services and
USTRANSCOM to develop procedures by July 2006 to address the reuse of
the tags as well as procedures for return of the tags no longer
required. However, the Department does not concur with establishing
procedures to account for the procurement, inventory, repair, or losses
of existing tags in the system. These tags are consumable items.
Active tag use and reuse is monitored by PM J-AIT and reports are
generated that provide last tag read locations. These reports are
available to the components. The Department will ensure the components
are aware of this capability so they may better utilize these reports
in managing active RFID tag use. In addition, although many tags have
been written only once, there may be legitimate operational reasons for
these occurrences. The Office of the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary
of Defense (Supply Chain Integration), along with the components, will
investigate the causes for such low instances of tag reuse and analyze
the business processes that may be contributing to this situation.
[End of section]
(350690):
FOOTNOTES
[1] GAO, Defense Logistics: Better Strategic Planning Can Help Ensure
DOD's Successful Implementation of Passive Radio Frequency
Identification, GAO-05-345 (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 12, 2005).
[2] The Army Program Executive Office, Enterprise Information Systems,
Product Manager Joint - Automatic Identification Technology Office
began recording purchases of active RFID tags in December 1997.
[3] Department of Defense, Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final
Report to the Congress (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 1992); GAO, Operation
Desert Storm: Lack of Accountability Over Materiel During Redeployment,
GAO/NSIAD-92-258 (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 23, 1992); U.S. Army Materiel
Command (USAMC), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), Lessons Learned
Conference (Redstone Arsenal, Ala.: Sept. 10-11, 2003); GAO, Defense
Logistics: Preliminary Observations on the Effectiveness of Logistics
Activities during Operation Iraqi Freedom, GAO-04-305R (Washington,
D.C.: Dec. 18, 2003); Department of Defense, Objective Assessment of
Logistics in Iraq: DUSD(L&MR) and Joint Staff (JSJ4) Sponsored
Assessment to Review the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Selected
Aspects of Logistics Operations During Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)
(Washington, D.C.: Mar. 2004); GAO, Defense Inventory: Actions Needed
to Improve the Availability of Critical Items during Current and Future
Operations, GAO-05-275 (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 8, 2005).
[4] If tags are returned through this program, services will be
reimbursed for packaging, crating, handling, and transportation costs.
Services will not be reimbursed for tags returned without going through
this program.
[5] DOD policy does not require routine collection of reuse data or
that components establish procedures to monitor tag reuse.
