INTERPOL

Information on the Red Notice System Gao ID: IMTEC-93-23 March 29, 1993

The International Criminal Police Organization's (INTERPOL) red notice system sends out international "wanted posters" to help identify and capture fugitives who have committed crimes in the United States. GAO found that the arrest rate for these individuals is unknown because red notice data are not compiled by the U.S. National Central Bureau, INTERPOL, or the Justice Department. Red notices have not been sought for all eligible fugitives mainly because law enforcement officials view them as unnecessary or unhelpful in some cases. Data accuracy is another problem, with discrepancies affecting 43 percent of the files and documentation for red notices issued in fiscal year 1992. Law enforcement officials, however, characterize these discrepancies as minor. GAO also noted shortcomings in computer security. The U.S. National Central Bureau has no guarantee either that its data processing facility and system would continue operating during an emergency or that computer security threats would be identified and countered. Additionally, critical back-up files were not stored apart from the U.S. National Central Bureau site.

GAO found that: (1) statistics specifically pertaining to the arrest rate for U.S. fugitives who are subjects of red notices are not available because USNCB, INTERPOL, nor the Department of Justice collect data on such fugitives; (2) of the 114 U.S. fugitives entered into the red notice system between April 1990 and December 1992, USNCB has apprehended 37 percent as a result of red notices and diffusions; (3) law enforcement agencies do not compile data on red notices because they are one of many law enforcement tools used to apprehend fugitives, U.S. fugitives are more often apprehended as a result of diffusion, and it is not always possible to attribute an arrest to a specific cause; (4) none of the 199 fugitives wanted for drug-smuggling crimes were the subjects of red notices when comparing National Crime Information Center records to the red notice system; (5) law enforcement officials did not request red notices because they knew where the fugitive was staying, were not aware of the red notice system, or the cost of extradition outweighed the significance of the crime; (6) of the 60 red notices reviewed, there were 39 discrepancies in information between the notices and records maintained in USNCB red notice case files and the automated case tracking system; (7) USNCB had not conducted a risk analysis to identify threats to its systems and computer data, or developed contingency plans or a computer security plan; and (8) USNCB has no reasonable assurance that its data processing facility and systems would continue operating in the event of an emergency and computer security threats would be identified and countered.



The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.