U.S. Postal Service
Action Needed to Facilitate Financial Viability
Gao ID: GAO-10-601T April 22, 2010
The U.S. Postal Service's (USPS) financial condition and outlook deteriorated significantly during fiscal years 2007 through 2009. USPS was not able to cut costs fast enough to offset declines in mail volumes and revenues resulting from the economic recession and changes in the use of mail, such as electronic bill payment. In July 2009, GAO added USPS's financial condition to its high-risk list and reported that USPS urgently needed to restructure to improve its financial viability. The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) of 2006 required GAO to evaluate strategies and options for USPS's long-term structural and operational reform and report by December 2011. Because of USPS's financial crisis and the need for urgent action, GAO accelerated its work and issued a report (GAO-10-455) on April 12, 2010. This testimony provides (1) information on USPS's financial condition and outlook and (2) GAO's perspective on the actions that are needed to facilitate progress toward USPS's financial viability. This testimony is based on GAO's recently issued report and recent testimonies on USPS's financial condition and outlook.
USPS is facing a major financial crisis. Mail volumes, the primary source of USPS revenues, declined by 36 billion pieces (about 17 percent) over the last three fiscal years (2007 through 2009). Mail volume declines were largely due to the economic downturn and changing use of the mail linked to the continuing shift to electronic communications and payments. USPS's financial outlook is poor as it projects future declines in mail volumes, stagnating revenues, large financial losses, increasing debt, and significant financial obligations, including for retiree health benefits. USPS projects a record loss of over $7 billion in fiscal year 2010. Furthermore, USPS expects to borrow $3 billion, bringing its total outstanding debt to $13.2 billion, close to its $15 billion statutory borrowing limit with the U.S. Treasury. Looking forward, USPS projects that by fiscal year 2020, total mail volume will further decline by 15 percent, to the lowest level since 1986. Absent additional actions to cut costs and increase revenues, USPS expects financial losses will escalate over the next decade. GAO recently reported that making progress toward USPS's financial viability would primarily involve taking action to rightsize operations, cut costs, and increase revenues. Making the necessary progress would require USPS and Congress to pursue strategies and options that would (1) reduce compensation, benefits, and other operations and network costs using the collective bargaining process to address wages, benefits, and workforce flexibility, as well as generating revenues through pricing and product flexibility; and (2) address legal restrictions and resistance to realigning USPS operations, networks, and workforce. USPS included many of these strategies and options in the action plan it issued in March 2010, but these planned actions under its existing authority will not be enough to make it financially viable. Therefore, action by Congress and USPS is urgently needed to (1) reach agreement on actions to achieve USPS's financial viability; (2) provide financial relief through deferral of costs by revising USPS retiree health benefit funding while continuing to fund these benefits over time to the extent that USPS's finances permit; and (3) require that any binding arbitration resulting from collective bargaining would take USPS's financial condition into account. To facilitate reaching agreement about the difficult constraints and legal restrictions that hamper progress, Congress could consider establishing a panel of independent experts, similar to the approach used by the Department of Defense's Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission, to coordinate with USPS and stakeholders to recommend a package of proposed legislative and operational changes needed to reduce costs and address challenges to USPS's business model.
GAO-10-601T, U.S. Postal Service: Action Needed to Facilitate Financial Viability
This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-10-601T
entitled 'U.S. Postal Service: Action Needed to Facilitate Financial
Viability' which was released on April 22, 2010.
This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as
part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility.
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features,
such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes
placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters,
are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format
of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov.
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this
material separately.
Testimony:
Before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government
Information, Federal Services, and International Security, Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate:
United States Government Accountability Office:
GAO:
For Release on Delivery:
Expected at 2:30 p.m. EDT:
Thursday, April 22, 2010:
U.S. Postal Service:
Action Needed to Facilitate Financial Viability:
Statement of Phillip Herr, Director:
Physical Infrastructure Issues:
GAO-10-601T:
GAO Highlights:
Highlights of GAO-10-601T, a testimony to the Subcommittee on Federal
Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and
International Security, Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate.
Why GAO Did This Study:
The U.S. Postal Service‘s (USPS) financial condition and outlook
deteriorated significantly during fiscal years 2007 through 2009. USPS
was not able to cut costs fast enough to offset declines in mail
volumes and revenues resulting from the economic recession and changes
in the use of mail, such as electronic bill payment. In July 2009, GAO
added USPS‘s financial condition to its high-risk list and reported
that USPS urgently needed to restructure to improve its financial
viability.
The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA) of 2006 required
GAO to evaluate strategies and options for USPS‘s long-term structural
and operational reform and report by December 2011. Because of USPS‘s
financial crisis and the need for urgent action, GAO accelerated its
work and issued a report (GAO-10-455) on April 12, 2010.
This testimony provides (1) information on USPS‘s financial condition
and outlook and (2) GAO‘s perspective on the actions that are needed
to facilitate progress toward USPS‘s financial viability. This
testimony is based on GAO‘s recently issued report and recent
testimonies on USPS‘s financial condition and outlook.
What GAO Found:
USPS is facing a major financial crisis. Mail volumes, the primary
source of USPS revenues, declined by 36 billion pieces (about 17
percent) over the last three fiscal years (2007 through 2009). Mail
volume declines were largely due to the economic downturn and changing
use of the mail linked to the continuing shift to electronic
communications and payments. USPS‘s financial outlook is poor as it
projects future declines in mail volumes, stagnating revenues, large
financial losses, increasing debt, and significant financial
obligations, including for retiree health benefits. USPS projects a
record loss of over $7 billion in fiscal year 2010. Furthermore, USPS
expects to borrow $3 billion, bringing its total outstanding debt to
$13.2 billion, close to its $15 billion statutory borrowing limit with
the U.S. Treasury. Looking forward, USPS projects that by fiscal year
2020, total mail volume will further decline by 15 percent, to the
lowest level since 1986. Absent additional actions to cut costs and
increase revenues, USPS expects financial losses will escalate over
the next decade.
GAO recently reported that making progress toward USPS‘s financial
viability would primarily involve taking action to rightsize
operations, cut costs, and increase revenues. Making the necessary
progress would require USPS and Congress to pursue strategies and
options that would:
* reduce compensation, benefits, and other operations and network
costs using the collective bargaining process to address wages,
benefits, and workforce flexibility, as well as generating revenues
through pricing and product flexibility; and;
* address legal restrictions and resistance to realigning USPS
operations, networks, and workforce.
USPS included many of these strategies and options in the action plan
it issued in March 2010, but these planned actions under its existing
authority will not be enough to make it financially viable. Therefore,
action by Congress and USPS is urgently needed to:
* reach agreement on actions to achieve USPS‘s financial viability;
* provide financial relief through deferral of costs by revising USPS
retiree health benefit funding while continuing to fund these benefits
over time to the extent that USPS‘s finances permit; and;
* require that any binding arbitration resulting from collective
bargaining would take USPS‘s financial condition into account.
To facilitate reaching agreement about the difficult constraints and
legal restrictions that hamper progress, Congress could consider
establishing a panel of independent experts, similar to the approach
used by the Department of Defense‘s Base Realignment and Closure
(BRAC) Commission, to coordinate with USPS and stakeholders to
recommend a package of proposed legislative and operational changes
needed to reduce costs and address challenges to USPS‘s business model.
View [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-601T] or key
components. For more information, contact Phillip Herr at (202) 512-
2834 or herrp@gao.gov.
[End of section]
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee:
I am pleased to participate in this hearing on the U.S. Postal
Service's (USPS) financial condition, a topic we have addressed in
recent reports and testimonies. My statement will provide (1)
information on USPS's financial condition and outlook and (2) our
perspective on the actions that are needed to facilitate progress
toward its financial viability.
My statement is primarily based upon our report released last week on
USPS's business model.[Footnote 1] The report responded to a provision
in the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA) that
required GAO to evaluate strategies and options for the long-term
structural and operational reform of USPS.[Footnote 2] We also drew on
our recent testimonies on USPS's financial condition and outlook and
our July 2009 report in which we added USPS's financial condition to
our high-risk list.[Footnote 3] For our recent report, we primarily
drew on this past work; other studies; USPS data; interviews with
USPS, unions, management associations, Postal Regulatory Commission
(PRC), and mailing industry officials; and stakeholder input. We
conducted our work in accordance with generally accepted government
auditing standards. Additional information on scope and methodology is
available in each full product. Related GAO reports and testimonies
are listed in the attachment to this statement.
USPS's Financial Condition Has Deteriorated and Its Financial Outlook
Is Poor:
USPS is facing a major financial crisis. Mail volumes, the primary
source of USPS revenues, declined by 36 billion pieces (about 17
percent) over the last 3 fiscal years (2007 through 2009). In
particular, First-Class Mail and Standard Mail--which together
accounted for 94 percent of volume and about 78 percent of revenue in
fiscal year 2009--experienced major declines. These declines were
largely due to the economic downturn and the continuing shift to
electronic communications and payments.
Both USPS and Congress took actions in fiscal years 2007 through 2009
to help offset these declines by reducing billions in USPS costs. For
example,
* USPS achieved nearly $10 billion in cost savings during this time,
primarily by cutting nearly 201 million work hours. Work-hour savings
were achieved by workforce reductions of over 84,000 full-and part-
time employees, primarily through retirements; reduced overtime; and
changes to postal operations.
* Congressional action late in fiscal year 2009 deferred $4 billion in
payments USPS was mandated to make to prefund postal retiree health
benefits.[Footnote 4]
These actions, along with others to generate additional revenues,
however, were insufficient to fully offset the impact of mail volume
declines and rising personnel-related costs. As a result, over this 3-
year period, USPS borrowed the maximum $3 billion each year from the
U.S. Treasury and still incurred record net losses, cumulatively
losing nearly $12 billion.
USPS's financial problems are likely to continue unless fundamental
changes are made to address challenges in its current business model
by better aligning costs with revenues. USPS projects future declines
in mail volumes, stagnating revenues, large financial losses,
increasing debt, and significant financial obligations. For example,
total mail volume for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 was down
almost 4.4 billion pieces, a decrease of almost 9 percent over last
year. For fiscal years 2010 and 2011, USPS is already projecting
annual deficits exceeding $7 billion, creating additional pressures to
generate sufficient cash to meet its obligations. USPS expects to
borrow $3 billion in fiscal year 2010, which would bring its total
outstanding debt to $13.2 billion, close to its $15 billion statutory
limit, which it could reach as early as fiscal year 2011. Moreover,
USPS projections through fiscal year 2020 indicate that total mail
volume is not expected to return to its former levels (see figure 1).
Figure 1: Actual and Projected Total Mail Volume, Fiscal Years 1971
through 2020:
[Refer to PDF for image: line graph]
Fiscal year: 1971;
Mail pieces: 87.0 billion.
Fiscal year: 1972;
Mail pieces: 87.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 1973;
Mail pieces: 89.7 billion.
Fiscal year: 1974;
Mail pieces: 90.1 billion.
Fiscal year: 1975;
Mail pieces: 89.3 billion.
Fiscal year: 1976;
Mail pieces: 89.8 billion.
Fiscal year: 1977;
Mail pieces: 93.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 1978;
Mail pieces: 96.9 billion.
Fiscal year: 1979;
Mail pieces: 99.8 billion.
Fiscal year: 1980;
Mail pieces: 106.3 billion.
Fiscal year: 1981;
Mail pieces: 110.1 billion.
Fiscal year: 1982;
Mail pieces: 114.0 billion.
Fiscal year: 1983;
Mail pieces: 119.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 1984;
Mail pieces: 131.5 billion.
Fiscal year: 1985;
Mail pieces: 140.1 billion.
Fiscal year: 1986;
Mail pieces: 147.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 1987;
Mail pieces: 153.9 billion.
Fiscal year: 1988;
Mail pieces: 161.0 billion.
Fiscal year: 1989;
Mail pieces: 161.6 billion.
Fiscal year: 1990;
Mail pieces: 166.3 billion.
Fiscal year: 1991;
Mail pieces: 165.9 billion.
Fiscal year: 1992;
Mail pieces: 166.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 1993;
Mail pieces: 171.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 1994;
Mail pieces: 178.0 billion.
Fiscal year: 1995;
Mail pieces: 180.7 billion.
Fiscal year: 1996;
Mail pieces: 183.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 1997;
Mail pieces: 190.9 billion.
Fiscal year: 1998;
Mail pieces: 196.9 billion.
Fiscal year: 1999;
Mail pieces: 201.6 billion.
Fiscal year: 2000;
Mail pieces: 207.9 billion.
Fiscal year: 2001;
Mail pieces: 207.5 billion.
Fiscal year: 2002;
Mail pieces: 202.8 billion.
Fiscal year: 2003;
Mail pieces: 202.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 2004;
Mail pieces: 206.1 billion.
Fiscal year: 2005;
Mail pieces: 211.7 billion.
Fiscal year: 2006;
Mail pieces: 213.0 billion.
Fiscal year: 2007;
Mail pieces: 212.2 billion.
Fiscal year: 2008;
Mail pieces: 202.7 billion.
Fiscal year: 2009;
Mail pieces: 177.1 billion.
Fiscal year: 2010;
Mail pieces: 166.1 billion.
Fiscal year: 2011;
Mail pieces: 164.0 billion.
Fiscal year: 2012;
Mail pieces: 164.6 billion.
Fiscal year: 2013;
Mail pieces: 164.6 billion.
Fiscal year: 2014;
Mail pieces: 161.6 billion.
Fiscal year: 2015;
Mail pieces: 158.6 billion.
Fiscal year: 2016;
Mail pieces: 155.5 billion.
Fiscal year: 2017;
Mail pieces: 153.3 billion.
Fiscal year: 2018;
Mail pieces: 151.4 billion.
Fiscal year: 2019;
Mail pieces: 150.0 billion.
Fiscal year: 2020;
Mail pieces: 148.9 billion.
Source: USPS.
Projected fiscal year 2020 volume: About 150 billion mail pieces, the
lowest level since fiscal year 1986.
[End of figure]
USPS projects that financial losses will escalate over the next
decade, with cumulative losses of over $238 billion by fiscal year
2020 if its planned cost reduction and revenue generation initiatives
are not implemented (see figure 2).
Figure 2: USPS Actual and Projected Net Income (Loss), Fiscal Years
2000 through 2020:
[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph]
Fiscal year: 2002;
Actual: -$0.68 billion.
Fiscal year: 2003;
Actual: $3.87 billion.
Fiscal year: 2004;
Actual: $3.07 billion.
Fiscal year: 2005;
Actual: $1.45 billion.
Fiscal year: 2006;
Actual: $0.9 billion.
Fiscal year: 2007;
Actual: -$5.14 billion.
Fiscal year: 2008;
Actual: -$2.81 billion.
Fiscal year: 2009;
Actual: -$3.79 billion.
Fiscal year: 2010;
Projected: -$7.8 billion.
Fiscal year: 2011;
Projected: -$11.75 billion.
Fiscal year: 2012;
Projected: -$15.14 billion.
Fiscal year: 2013;
Projected: -$16.99 billion.
Fiscal year: 2014;
Projected: -$19.77 billion.
Fiscal year: 2015;
Projected: -$22.56 billion.
Fiscal year: 2016;
Projected: -$25.6 billion.
Fiscal year: 2017;
Projected: -$24.62 billion.
Fiscal year: 2018;
Projected: -$26.98 billion.
Fiscal year: 2019;
Projected: -$30.11 billion.
Fiscal year: 2020;
Projected: -$33.07 billion.
Source: USPS.
Note: The projection for fiscal year 2010 is from USPS's Fiscal Year
2010 Integrated Financial Plan. USPS projections for fiscal years 2011
through 2020 are from its Action Plan and assume that (1) USPS takes
no management actions beyond those in its fiscal year 2009 budget and
(2) USPS's total statutory borrowing limit of $15 billion would be
increased to accommodate these losses. USPS's $8.4 billion in
cumulative net income for fiscal years 2003 through 2005 largely
resulted from a 2003 law (Pub. L. No. 108-18) that reduced USPS
pension benefit payments by about $9 billion over this period.
[End of figure]
These financial challenges highlight deficiencies in USPS's business
model, which is predicated on fulfilling its mission through self-
supporting, businesslike operations. The financial and operational
challenges facing USPS have been exacerbated by the recent economic
downturn. Because of these challenges, in July 2009, we placed USPS's
financial condition on our high-risk list and testified that
restructuring is needed to enhance USPS's current and long-term
financial viability.[Footnote 5] We concluded in our most recent
report that its business model is not viable because it is unable to
reduce costs sufficiently in response to continuing mail volume and
revenue declines. We continue to believe that major restructuring is
necessary and not doing so will increase the risk that taxpayers and
the U.S. Treasury will have to provide financial relief.
Actions Congress and USPS Can Take to Facilitate Progress toward
Financial Viability:
Action by Congress and USPS is urgently needed in a variety of areas
to facilitate progress toward USPS's financial viability. We have
identified a variety of strategies and options that can be taken to
address these challenges. Some of these strategies can be completed
within USPS's current authority, while others would need congressional
involvement or require collaboration with unions through collective
bargaining. The strategies fall into three major categories:
* reducing compensation and benefits costs,
* reducing other operations and network costs and improving
efficiency, and:
* generating revenues through product and pricing flexibility.
Other options that Congress may want to consider would more
comprehensively restructure USPS's statutory and regulatory framework
to reflect business and consumers' changing use of the mail. Although
our report did not focus on whether USPS's ownership structure should
be changed, we identified the following questions that could be
helpful when considering this framework:
* Mission: What universal postal service, including mail delivery and
postal retail service, is appropriate in light of fundamental changes
in the use of mail?
* Role: Should USPS be solely responsible for providing universal
delivery and postal retail service, or should that responsibility be
shared with the private sector?
* Monopoly: Does USPS need a monopoly over delivery of certain types
of letter mail and access to mail boxes to finance--in part or wholly--
universal postal service?
* Governance and regulation: What is an appropriate balance between
USPS's managerial flexibility and the oversight and accountability
provided by the current governance and regulatory structure?
To facilitate progress going forward, it will be critical for USPS and
Congress to reach agreement with other stakeholders on major issues
that impede USPS's ability to implement actions to reduce financial
losses, such as the following:
* Funding postal retiree health benefits: USPS has said that it cannot
afford its required prefunding payments, and several proposals have
been made to defer costs by revising the statutory requirements. It is
important that USPS fund its retiree health benefit obligations--
including prefunding these obligations--to the maximum extent that its
finances permit. In revising the requirements, it will be important to
consider what is affordable to USPS; what is a fair balance of
payments between current and future ratepayers; and what impact such
changes could have on the federal budget.[Footnote 6]
* Binding arbitration: One of the most difficult challenges is making
changes to USPS's compensation systems, which will be critical to its
financial condition since wages and benefits represent 80 percent of
its costs. USPS and its employee unions will begin negotiations for
new agreements in 2010 and 2011. In this regard, the time has come to
reexamine the structure for collective bargaining that was developed
40 years ago. Since that time, USPS's competitive environment has
changed dramatically, and rising personnel costs are contributing to
escalating financial losses. Thus, Congress should consider modifying
the collective bargaining process to ensure that any binding
arbitration takes USPS's financial condition into account.
* Realigning postal services with changing use of the mail: As mail
use by businesses and consumers continues to change, USPS has stated
that it cannot afford to provide the same level of services. For
example, it has estimated that costs could be reduced by about $3
billion annually if delivery frequency is reduced from 6 days to 5
days per week, but congressional action would be needed to remove
statutory requirements for 6-day mail delivery. USPS filed its
proposal to eliminate Saturday delivery with the PRC on March 30,
2010. This action will allow public input on this issue and lead to a
PRC advisory opinion.
* Generating revenue through new or enhanced products and services: A
key issue is whether USPS can make sufficient progress using the
pricing and product flexibility provided in PAEA or if changes are
needed. In 2009, USPS asked Congress to change the law so that it
could diversify into nonpostal areas to find new opportunities for
revenue growth. USPS and stakeholders we collected information from
offered many options for diversification into nonpostal areas,
including banking, financial, insurance, and government services,
either on its own or in partnership with other private firms or
government agencies. USPS also asked for additional pricing
flexibility in a recently issued Action Plan.[Footnote 7] However, it
is unclear what the potential impacts of such changes would be and
what statutory or regulatory changes would be needed.
* Realigning operations, networks, and workforce: Once Congress and
USPS have determined what, if any, changes should be made in the
products and services that it provides, postal operations, networks,
and workforce would need to be realigned. Decisions in this area will
involve difficult tradeoffs related to reducing USPS's size so as to
remain self-financing and keep prices affordable, versus concerns
about how such realignments would affect its workforce, the value of
USPS's brand, and its network of physical assets.
When we placed USPS on our high-risk list, we suggested that USPS
develop and implement a broad restructuring plan that would identify
specific actions planned, key issues to address, and steps Congress
and other stakeholders needed to take. On March 2, 2010, USPS issued
an Action Plan that identified seven key areas in which it would need
legislative changes or congressional support. Many of the options
discussed are similar to those we have analyzed and included in our
recent report. USPS's plan indicates that actions within its control
can close $123 billion of this financial gap, but that actions outside
its existing authority--including some involving statutory changes--
will be needed to eliminate the remaining financial gap. Progress on
these issues will likely take several years to fully implement once a
decision is made on the scope of needed changes.
Congress, USPS, and other stakeholders need to reach agreement on the
actions that should be taken, the desired operational and financial
results, and the time frames for implementation. Key questions that
need to be addressed include the following:
* Universal service: What, if any, changes are needed--that is, should
delivery services be changed (e.g., frequency or standards), and
should retail services be moved out of post offices to alternative
locations?
* Realigning operations, networks, and workforce: How should USPS
optimize its operations, networks, and workforce to support changes in
services? How quickly can this happen? How can USPS best work with its
employees and customers to minimize potential disruption?
* New products and services: What opportunities are there to introduce
profitable new postal products and enhancements to existing ones?
Should USPS engage in nonpostal areas where there are private-sector
providers? If so, under what terms?
In our recent report, we stated that to facilitate progress in
difficult areas, such as realigning operations, networks, and
workforce, Congress may want to consider an approach similar to that
used by the Department of Defense's Base Realignment and Closure
(BRAC) Commission. USPS agreed with the report's key findings but
raised concerns about using a BRAC-type panel and its timing. Congress
has previously turned to panels of independent experts to assist in
restructuring organizations that are facing key financial challenges.
These panels have helped establish consensus and developed proposed
legislative or other changes to address difficult public policy
issues. Establishing a similar commission or control board of
independent experts could provide a mechanism to assist Congress in
making timely decisions and comprehensive changes to USPS's business
model and operations.
In addition to establishing a panel, our report included two other
matters for Congress to consider to address USPS's financial viability
in the short term:
* Modify USPS's retiree health benefit cost structure in a fiscally
responsible manner.
* Revise the statutory framework for collective bargaining to ensure
that binding arbitration takes USPS's financial condition into account.
The current crisis presents an opportunity to act and position this
important American institution for the future. The longer it takes for
USPS and Congress to address USPS's challenges, the more difficult
they will be to overcome.
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my prepared statement. I would be pleased
to answer any questions that you or other Members of the Committee may
have.
Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:
For further information regarding this statement, please contact
Phillip Herr at (202) 512-2834 or herrp@gao.gov. Individuals who made
key contributions to this statement include: Shirley Abel, Amy
Abramowitz, Teresa Anderson, Joseph Applebaum, Gerald Barnes, Joshua
Bartzen, William Dougherty, Patrick Dudley, Brandon Haller, Carol
Henn, Paul Hobart, Kenneth John, Anar Ladhani, Hannah Laufe, Scott
McNulty, Daniel Paepke, Susan Ragland, Amy Rosewarne, Travis Thomson,
Jack Wang, and Crystal Wesco.
[End of section]
Related GAO Products:
U.S. Postal Service: Action Needed to Facilitate Financial Viability.
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-624T]. Washington,
D.C.: April 15, 2010.
U.S. Postal Service: Strategies and Options to Facilitate Progress
toward Financial Viability. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-455]. Washington, D.C.: April 12,
2010.
U.S. Postal Service: Financial Crisis Demands Aggressive Action.
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-538T]. Washington,
D.C.: March 18, 2010.
U.S. Postal Service: The Program for Reassessing Work Provided to
Injured Employees Is Under Way, but Actions Are Needed to Improve
Program Management. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-78]. Washington, D.C.: December 14,
2009.
U.S. Postal Service: Financial Challenges Continue, with Relatively
Limited Results from Recent Revenue-Generation Efforts. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-191T]. Washington, D.C.: November
5, 2009.
U.S. Postal Service: Restructuring Urgently Needed to Achieve
Financial Viability. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-958T]. Washington, D.C.: August 6,
2009.
U.S. Postal Service: Broad Restructuring Needed to Address
Deteriorating Finances. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-790T]. Washington, D.C.: July 30,
2009.
High Risk Series: Restructuring the U.S. Postal Service to Achieve
Sustainable Financial Viability. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-937SP]. Washington, D.C.: July 28,
2009.
U.S. Postal Service: Mail Delivery Efficiency Has Improved, but
Additional Actions Needed to Achieve Further Gains. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-696]. Washington, D.C.: July 15,
2009.
U.S. Postal Service: Network Rightsizing Needed to Help Keep USPS
Financially Viable. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-674T]. Washington, D.C.: May 20,
2009.
U.S. Postal Service: Escalating Financial Problems Require Major Cost
Reductions to Limit Losses. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-475T]. Washington, D.C.: March 25,
2009.
U.S. Postal Service: Deteriorating Postal Finances Require Aggressive
Actions to Reduce Costs. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-332T]. Washington, D.C.: January
28, 2009.
U.S. Postal Service: USPS Has Taken Steps to Strengthen Network
Realignment Planning and Accountability and Improve Communication.
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-1022T]. Washington,
D.C.: July 24, 2008.
U.S. Postal Service: Data Needed to Assess the Effectiveness of
Outsourcing. [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-787].
Washington, D.C.: July 24, 2008.
U.S. Postal Service Facilities: Improvements in Data Would Strengthen
Maintenance and Alignment of Access to Retail Service. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-41]. Washington, D.C.: December 10,
2007.
U.S. Postal Service: Mail Processing Realignment Efforts Under Way
Need Better Integration and Explanation. [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07-717]. Washington, D.C.: June 21,
2007.
[End of section]
Footnotes:
[1] GAO, U.S. Postal Service: Strategies and Options to Facilitate
Progress toward Financial Viability, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-455] (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 12,
2010).
[2] Pub. L. No. 109-435, §710, 120 Stat. 3198 (Dec. 20, 2006).
[3] GAO, High-Risk Series: Restructuring the U.S. Postal Service to
Achieve Sustainable Financial Viability, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-937SP] (Washington, D.C.: July 28,
2009). USPS's transformation efforts and long-term outlook were on our
high-risk list from 2001 to 2007.
[4] Pub. L. No. 111-68, §164, 123 Stat. 2023 (Oct. 1, 2009).
[5] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-937SP] and GAO,
U.S. Postal Service: Broad Restructuring Needed to Address
Deteriorating Finances, [hyperlink,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-790T] (Washington, D.C.: July 30,
2009).
[6] See [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-455] for a
discussion of different approaches for funding USPS's retiree health
benefit obligations.
[7] United States Postal Service, Ensuring a Viable Postal Service for
America: An Action Plan for the Future (Washington, D.C.: March 2010).
USPS's plan and related material are available at the following Web
address: [hyperlink,
http://www.usps.com/strategicplanning/futurepostalservice.htm]
(accessed on Apr. 9, 2010).
[End of section]
GAO's Mission:
The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance
and accountability of the federal government for the American people.
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability.
Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony:
The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]
and select "E-mail Updates."
Order by Phone:
The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO‘s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO‘s Web site,
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm].
Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537.
Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional
information.
To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs:
Contact:
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]:
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov:
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470:
Congressional Relations:
Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4400:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7125:
Washington, D.C. 20548:
Public Affairs:
Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov:
(202) 512-4800:
U.S. Government Accountability Office:
441 G Street NW, Room 7149:
Washington, D.C. 20548: