Department of Housing and Urban Development Unresponsive to Multifamily Housing Real Estate Tax Problems

Gao ID: CED-77-125 September 27, 1977

Although the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has been able to reduce real estate taxes sporadically through local appeal actions, it has been unresponsive generally to real estate tax problems of multifamily housing projects. The lack of a program to verify that taxes assessed on HUD-insured projects are fair and equitable has resulted in payment of excessive taxes and approval of unnecessary rent increases.

A review of the Chicago, Detroit, and Dallas area office operations indicated that HUD has not effectively reviewed and appealed tax assessments on projects it owns, insured proper and timely payment of taxes on these projects, or concerned itself with real estate taxes in its review of financial operations of insured projects. These problems were caused, in part, by a lack of needed tax information at the local offices and the absence of a headquarters policy on servicing insured-project tax problems. In Detroit, HUD was overassessed in several cases, paid taxes on projects it did not own, and paid $35,000 worth of late charges. In other cases, HUD paid unnecessary taxes by not taking advantage of State relief laws, and did not appeal a known overassessment. Although area offices are required to evaluate the fairness of tax assessments, they do not have the data available to them. HUD believes that tax assessment review for insured projects is the owners' responsibility.

Recommendations

Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

Director: No director on record Team: No team on record Phone: No phone on record


The Justia Government Accountability Office site republishes public reports retrieved from the U.S. GAO These reports should not be considered official, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Justia.